It’s perfectly reasonable to discuss the need for specific fee structures to achieve specific number resource policy objectives.
To the extent that folks want to have the fees for ASN’s reviewed and possibly changed, I’d suggest that a suggestion be put in the ARIN consultation and suggestion process - <https://www.arin.net/participate/community/acsp/> Thanks! /John John Curran President and CEO American Registry for Internet Numbers On 18 Sep 2022, at 9:13 PM, William Herrin <b...@herrin.us<mailto:b...@herrin.us>> wrote: On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 8:59 AM Gary Buhrmaster <gary.buhrmas...@gmail.com<mailto:gary.buhrmas...@gmail.com>> wrote: On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 8:03 AM William Herrin <b...@herrin.us<mailto:b...@herrin.us>> wrote: I conditionally support this proposal on the condition that there is an accompanying change to the fee schedule such that the second and subsequent AS numbers assigned to a single organization each incur an additional annual fee. I tend to agree here (although, as always, fees are not an issue for policy discussions.....) Hi Gary, Well, yes and no. The mechanisms we expect ARIN to use to discourage waste of number resources (and the conditions under which it is appropriate to do so) are within scope for policy. To the extent that money is a major motivator for discouraging waste, I think its discussion in the context of policy is appropriate. I agree that the more specific a discussion of money gets, the less likely it is to be in scope for a policy discussion. But a high-level "money should discourage this activity but not be a barrier to that activity" discussion is reasonable and I think it would needlessly hobble the policy development process to arbitrarily rule anything that touches money to be business process. On Sun, Sep 18, 2022 at 1:16 PM David Farmer <far...@umn.edu<mailto:far...@umn.edu>> wrote: I’ll note there is still a $550 Transactional Fee for the issuance of an ASN, I think that is a sufficiently large fee to discourage excessive use of ASNs. Hi David, Fair point. I'll revise my comment to make it more high-level: I conditionally support this proposal on the condition that [it is matched with a] fee schedule such that the second and subsequent AS numbers assigned to a single organization each incur an additional [strike annual] fee. Regards, Bill Herrin -- For hire. https://bill.herrin.us/resume/ _______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net<mailto:ARIN-PPML@arin.net>). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.
_______________________________________________ ARIN-PPML You are receiving this message because you are subscribed to the ARIN Public Policy Mailing List (ARIN-PPML@arin.net). Unsubscribe or manage your mailing list subscription at: https://lists.arin.net/mailman/listinfo/arin-ppml Please contact i...@arin.net if you experience any issues.