On 27 Mar 2013 03:38, "Nicolas Pitre" <n...@fluxnic.net> wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Mar 2013, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > > > We could create a number of uboot headers. Then after loading the default > > uImage, load a separate uboot header overwriting the first 64 bytes of RAM. > > Please don't engage in those senseless games just to work around a > stupid restriction of the uImage file format. > > If uImage is a problem, just don't use it, period. Problem solved. All > the targets supported by the unified kernel are recent enough to have > bootz support in their U-Boot source. Please use that.
Can you substantiate "recent enough"? The bootz option was in my mind but I have no recollection of how recently it was introduced. > Or, consider the mkimage process as part of the kernel _installation_ > procedure and not a pre-distribution step. But if I were you I'd go the > bootz route for its simplicity. > > > Nicolas > _______________________________________________ > arm mailing list > arm@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
_______________________________________________ arm mailing list arm@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/arm
