hmm, so then why won't normal subinterfaces work either then? Just taking a look over the code, I see what looks like vlan support as well:
1197 <http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c#L1197> */* Init Rx */*1198 <http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c#L1198> */* Set Vlan */*1199 <http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c#L1199> ret <http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?i=ret> = smsc95xx_write_reg <http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?i=smsc95xx_write_reg>(dev <http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?i=dev>, VLAN1 <http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?i=VLAN1>, (u32 <http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?i=u32>)ETH_P_8021Q <http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?i=ETH_P_8021Q>);1200 <http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c#L1200> if (ret <http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?i=ret> < 0)1201 <http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/drivers/net/usb/smsc95xx.c#L1201> return ret <http://lxr.free-electrons.com/ident?i=ret>; On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 1:02 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 7:32 AM, solarflow99 <solarflo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Has anyone setup subinterfaces like eth0.10, etc? I have a tagged vlan > and > > I can't get it to see the devices at all, all I ever get when trying to > > bring up the interface is: > > > > device does not seem to be present delaying initialization > > > > I had to modprobe 8021q manually, but it doesn't help anyways, even > without > > tagging it doesn't see anything else except eth0 by itself. > > I don't believe the smsc95xx driver supports vlans (from a grep of the > driver code) I'm not sure if that's a hardware limitation or whether > it's just not been implemented in the driver. >
_______________________________________________ arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to arm-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
