On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 10:21 PM, solarflow99 <solarflo...@gmail.com> wrote: > ha! I got it to work. Had to be done manually, I have no idea why the > ifcfg- scripts just won't take it, all it ever accepted was eth0:0 as a > regular subinterface and thats it. > > > ip link add link eth0 name eth0.1 type vlan id 1 > ip addr add 0.0.0.0 dev eth0.1 > ip link set eth0.1 up > dhclient eth0.1 > > > # ip -d link show eth0.1 > 3: eth0.1@eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue > state UP mode DEFAULT group default qlen 1000 > link/ether b8:27:eb:20:25:16 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff promiscuity 0 > vlan protocol 802.1Q id 1 <REORDER_HDR> addrgenmode eui64 numtxqueues 1 > numrxqueues 1 > > # ip addr show eth0.1 > 3: eth0.1@eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue > state UP group default qlen 1000 > link/ether b8:27:eb:20:25:16 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff > inet 192.168.0.117/24 brd 192.168.0.255 scope global dynamic eth0.1 > valid_lft 86066sec preferred_lft 86066sec > inet6 fe80::ba27:ebff:fe20:2516/64 scope link > valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever > > > > And... no one else on here knew that...
Likely nobody has a need to use vlans on the device. I certainly haven't tested it. > On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 1:09 PM, solarflow99 <solarflo...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> hmm, so then why won't normal subinterfaces work either then? Just taking >> a look over the code, I see what looks like vlan support as well: >> >> 1197 /* Init Rx */ >> 1198 /* Set Vlan */ >> 1199 ret = smsc95xx_write_reg(dev, VLAN1, (u32)ETH_P_8021Q); >> 1200 if (ret < 0) >> 1201 return ret; >> >> >> >> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 1:02 AM, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 7:32 AM, solarflow99 <solarflo...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > Has anyone setup subinterfaces like eth0.10, etc? I have a tagged vlan >>> > and >>> > I can't get it to see the devices at all, all I ever get when trying to >>> > bring up the interface is: >>> > >>> > device does not seem to be present delaying initialization >>> > >>> > I had to modprobe 8021q manually, but it doesn't help anyways, even >>> > without >>> > tagging it doesn't see anything else except eth0 by itself. >>> >>> I don't believe the smsc95xx driver supports vlans (from a grep of the >>> driver code) I'm not sure if that's a hardware limitation or whether >>> it's just not been implemented in the driver. >> >> > _______________________________________________ arm mailing list -- arm@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to arm-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
