I do agree that one of the few applications of i. and s. effects is to
labor supply (this was mentioned in my first post). (This is because
labor is one of the few goods where the income effect is likely to be
large.) Hence that is the context in which I teach the material. It is
appalling, therefore, that most textbooks teach i. and s. effects early
on and leave labor supply to an entirely different part of the text.
Bill, do you really mean to say that you think that Giffen goods are a
real phenomena???! Even the classic, Irish potato famine has much better
explanations (e.g. Rosen recent JPE) than in terms of Giffen goods.
As to what to teach instead there are many choices e.g. most
intermediate classes don't cover the Coase theorem or any law and
economics, finance is another topic that could be taught more at the i.
level.
Alex
--
Alexander Tabarrok
Department of Economics, MSN 1D3
George Mason University
Fairfax, VA, 22030
Tel. 703-993-2314
Web Page: http://mason.gmu.edu/~atabarro/
and
Director of Research
The Independent Institute
100 Swan Way
Oakland, CA, 94621
Tel. 510-632-1366
- income and substitution effect Alex T Tabarrok
- Re: income and substitution effect William Sjostrom
- Re: income and substitution effect john hull
- Re: income and substitution effect Fred Foldvary
- RE: income and substitution effect Lee Coppock
- Re: income and substitution effect Alex T Tabarrok
- Re: income and substitution effect john hull
- Re: income and substitution effect wbutterfield
- Re: income and substitution effect William Dickens
- Re: income and substitution effect Alex T Tabarrok
- Re: income and substitution effect Jacob W Braestrup
- Re: income and substitution effect William Dickens
- RE: income and substitution effect Lee Coppock