Hi Mark,

Thank you very much.

--Yiwen

On Aug 9, 7:32 am, "Mark Robinson" <mrobin...@wehi.edu.au> wrote:
> Hi Yiwen.
>
> I think this thread will answer your question in 
> detail:http://groups.google.com/group/aroma-affymetrix/browse_thread/thread/...
>
> In brief, the main difference is how the probe-level linear model is fit
> -- median polish OR iteratively reweighted least squares with a specified
> influence function.
>
> Note that in aroma.affymetrix, you have the 'flavor' argument in the
> RmaPlm and ExonRmaPlm objects.
>
> Cheers,
> Mark
>
>
>
> > Hi,
>
> > Following the "Reproducibility of other implementations Replication
> > test: RMA (background, normalization & summarization)" section in
> > aroma.affymetrix online document, I tried to compare the difference in
> > the RMA summary of gene expression index generated by
> > aroma.affymetrix, affyPLM and affy for a public dataset I am studying.
>
> > I found that the RMA summary generated by aroma.affymetrix and affyPLM
> > (fitPLM) are highly consistent, while
> > the values between aroma.affymetrix/affyPLM and affy(rma function) are
> > quite different (Pearson correlation is only about ~0.97) and there is
> > a significant deviation from straight line in the scatter-plot. I was
> > wonder  what is the main cause of the discrepency between RMA
> > calculated by aroma.affymetrix/affyPLM and affly(rma function).
>
> > Thanks  a lot.
>
> > Yiwen Chen
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
When reporting problems on aroma.affymetrix, make sure 1) to run the latest 
version of the package, 2) to report the output of sessionInfo() and 
traceback(), and 3) to post a complete code example.


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"aroma.affymetrix" group.
To post to this group, send email to aroma-affymetrix@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
aroma-affymetrix-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/aroma-affymetrix?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to