I heard that it is Rajni who prefer ARR than anyone else...

--- On Mon, 9/1/08, Vijay Anand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
From: Vijay Anand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [ARR] CHANDRAMUKHI - Why did ARR reject Chandramukhi
To: arrahmanfans@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, September 1, 2008, 4:25 PM










    
            i dont think Rajini prefers our Boss, its only Directors who 
preferred.
Muthu and Padaiyappa by K.S.Ravi kumar and Sivaji by Shankar.



On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 9:46 AM, mohammed sajin <[EMAIL PROTECTED] com> wrote:







After Baasha and Arunaachalam only, this combo come together.... ......... 
........

yes that is a known thing, that Superstar always prefer our boss........ 
......... ......


And I dont think Chandramukhi is a lose for ARR......... ........
 -- 

SAJIN
.

.
To err is human, to forgive... unlikely.



----- Original Message ----
From: Vithur <[EMAIL PROTECTED] com>
To: arrahmanfans@ yahoogroups. com

Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 9:48:46 AM
Subject: Re: [ARR] CHANDRAMUKHI - Why did ARR reject Chandramukhi










    
            Where did u get the news that ARR was approached for this 
project... Not all Rajni sir movies have ARR. It all depends on the production 
company, and the Director.. 
 
Arunachalam had DEVA , Baasha had DEVA 
 
Sivaji prductions which produced Chandramukhi didnt approach ARR at all.. 
 


 
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 8:15 PM, kishore parayath <kishore.parayath@ gmail.com> 
wrote:









Hi friends,
 
We all know, when superstar Rajnikanth plans a project, he always wants ARR as 
the composer.. After shelving Jaggubhai,(Which had Music by ARR), Rajini went 
to work on CHANDRAMUKHI.
 
Did ARR reject the project??
Some say that he had gone to Ilayaraaja, who declined it and suggested 
Vidyasagar in his place..
 
What is the truth?? 
 
This is a longterm doubt in me friends...Please clarify.
 


-- 
regards,
Vithur


ARR -- The Sweet Cube always


      


        
        


      




      

    
    
        
         
        
        








        


        
        


      

Reply via email to