Title: RE: I Am Outraged! - BMC/Remedy is Outsourcing Support!!
**

Warren:
 
Details for those of us not able to go to BUW?
 
James McKenzie

________________________________

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Warren Baltimore
Sent: Thursday, September 07, 2006 1:48 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: I Am Outraged! - BMC/Remedy is Outsourcing Support!!


**
Well....
 
That explains the Keynote speaker at this years User World (if it's true).  I wouldn't freak just yet.
 
Warren

 
On 9/7/06, Jamahowal Pinitubel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

        Hello community,
       
        I have it on good authority from one of my contacts at BMC that they will be
        starting to outsource their support to Pune, India and Dublin, Ireland very
        shortly.
       
        Am I the only one who is outraged by this?
       
        Our company already pays an unconscionable amount of money for Remedy
        Support. If they start to outsource I can guarantee you that our company
        will stop paying for support altogether next year because they will be
        diminishing the value of this support drastically but our maintenance fees
        will not be discounted.
       
        So THEY will be saving a ton of money by giving us compromised support but
        they will not be compensating us in any way (and we just renewed our
        maintenance contract before I was told of this!).
       
        In my experience, the second most valuable thing besides the actual AR
        System platform from Remedy is their support teams and infrastructure. If
        BMC is going to start carving the support infrastructure up and outsourcing
        it, then thay are going to lose the second most valuable pool of Remedy
        professionals next to the engineers themselves.
       
        What is BMC thinking? The executives are obviously boneheads who have NO
        IDEA of the value of the Remedy AR System product line and the Remedy
        support infrastructure.
       
        I have emailed Bob Beauchamp but have not had a response from him regarding
        this direction.
       
        If we can no longer rely on the past stellar support for this product, which
        is critical to us in our rapid development environment, we are going to
        seriously consider moving to another development platform entirely where
        they have on-site American/English speaking professionals - not underpayed
        call centre (KB screen-reader) reps who have no understanding and no context
        of the platform, and no relationships & restricted escalation paths with the
        Remedy software engineering community.
       
        As a longtime customer, I am personally outraged by this move and I am
        insulted that BMC has not contacted us nor have they solicited feedback on
        this initiative.
       
        What does everyone else think? (Please, EVERYONE chime in on this)
       
        What can we do to get BMC to keep their existing support infrastructure and
        stop them from farming out their support to people who can not even speak
        clear American English?
       
        JP
       
        _________________________________________________________________
        Deck to dock: outfit your cottage in stylish comfort. Check out Sympatico /
        MSN Shopping for great Cottage Living ideas.
        http://shopping.sympatico.msn.ca/category/shp/?bCatID=11,ptnrid=176,ptnrdata=081801
       
        _______________________________________________________________________________
        UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org
       




--
Warren R. Baltimore II
Remedy Developer
UW Medicine IT Services
School of Medicine
University of Washington
Box 358220
1325 Fourth Ave, Suite 2000
Seattle, WA 98101

The opinions expressed in this e-mail are in no way those of the University of Washington, or the State of Washington.  They are my own. __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in it___

__20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in it___

Reply via email to