<RANT>
Remedy WUT's help file shows:
   Go to the first field in the tab order  -  SHIFT+CTRL+HOME
   Go to the last field in the tab order  -  SHIFT+CTRL+END

 
Excel's Help file shows:
   CTRL+SHIFT+HOME Extend the selection to the beginning of the worksheet 
   CTRL+SHIFT+END Extend the selection to the last used cell on the worksheet 
(lower-right corner) 

 
Word's help file shows:
   CTRL+SHIFT+HOME To the beginning of a document 
   CTRL+SHIFT+END To the end of a document 

 
Even in version 7, patch 2, Remedy does not seem to adhere to the behavior 
described in their help file.  Here are a few examples:
 - In a table where Single Selection Only is not checked, pressing 
SHIFT+CTRL+END 
   selects everything from the current row through the last row.  This seems to 
be more like
   Excel's described behavior.  However if Single Selection Only is checked, 
the cursor will
   move to the last field in the tab order.
 - In a results list, pressing SHIFT+CTRL+HOME selects everything from the 
current row
   through the first row.  This seems to be more like Excel's described 
behavior.
 - In a non-expanded character field, SHIFT+CTRL+END will move the cursor to 
the last field
   in the tab order, but SHIFT+CTRL+HOME selects everything from the current 
cursor
   position through the first character.  This seems more like Word's described 
behavior.
 
Remedy also has documented functions which seem to work only with a mouse:
 - To select nonadjacent fields: click on the first field, press and hold the 
CTRL key, and
   select one or more additional fields. 
 - To resize fields: ... Select any field.  Place the cursor on one of the 
field's control handles.
   Hold down the mouse button, and move the mouse in the direction you want to 
resize. 
 
If anyone knows how to select non-adjacent rows or resize fields without a 
mouse, please let me know.  I've had this request from a few users.
 
Section 508 shows the following tests for keyboard operability:
  1. Inspect the application.  Unplug/disable all input devices except the 
keyboard,
      then attempt to execute the identified set of product functions using 
only the keyboard.
      a. Can the function be executed via the keyboard?
      b. Is the result of performing the function via the keyboard as expected 
or advertised?
  2  Inspect the program documentation.  Note that the identified set of 
functions can be
      invoked from the keyboard.  For applications that have a graphical user 
interface (GUI),
      identify any menu commands that cannot be executed from the keyboard.
      a. Are there documented functions that have no documented keyboard 
equivalent in the
          OS or Application?
      b. Are there commands that require pointing or visual analysis of the 
screen contents?
  Note: Satisfying this requirement does not involve interoperability with 
assistive technology.
 
It would sure be mighty swell if all the features worked as described within 
Remedy, but they seem to have a lot of undocumented exceptions overall.  I try 
to use the following as a best practice:
 - Use Mid-Tier instead of the WUT if at all possible.  Mid-Tier gives you far 
great control of
   not only keyboard accessibility features, but also text to speech, font 
size, etc...
 - Document the features that work consistently, and those that don't.
 - Use the features which work consistently.  Don't use that that do not.
 - Test everything with just a keyboard for input, and a small fuzzy monitor 
for viewing.
 - Write good user-level documentation.
 
One last point that's helped me to remember.  Work with your users.  Find out 
what they need.  Many issues can be addressed better with hardware than 
software.  For instance, a user with poor sight probably can't read a 1024x768 
form on their 15" monitor.  The same user may be able to read that form just 
fine when provided with a 27" monitor, still running at 1024x768.  Recoding the 
same form to work for that user at 480x640 on their 15" monitor would result in 
a lot more work,  smaller overall pixels, and a lot of scrolling.  Multiply 
that work by however many forms that user needs access to.
</RANT>
 
Eric Cleereman

-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Behalf Of Timothy Powell
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 10:18 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Key combination CTRL-SHIFT-END in numeric spinner field crashes 
usertool



** 
I think you'll discover that the 7.0 Patch 2, UT release not only does some 
quite remarkable things related to keyboard navigation......new things that 
Remedy has never been able to do before, but also makes big leaps towards the 
UT being Section 508 compliant. It should make life much easier for our users 
with limited/no sight.
 
Tim

  _____  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
On Behalf Of Rick Cook
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 10:12 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Key combination CTRL-SHIFT-END in numeric spinner field crashes 
usertool


** 
Glad to know there's a legitimate reason for it, Tim.  In that case, it should 
be fixed.
 
Rick
 
On 10/12/06, Timothy Powell < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

** 
> .....Sorry to be unsympathetic here, but is there a legitimate business 
> reason to perform that key combo as  
> part of processing a ticket.....
 
 
Rick,
These keyboard combos are VERY useful for users with limited or no vision, that 
rely completely on keyboard to do their navigation. 
SHFT-CTRL-END combo takes you to the last field in any given form. 
SHFT-CTRL-HOME combo takes you to the first field in any given form.
Try tabbing from the middle of the HPD:Helpdesk form to the first or last 
field....not pretty.
In a numeric spinner, the SHFT-CTRL-HOME combo also crashes the UT.
This should be addressed in the 7.0 Patch 2, User Tool release.
 
Tim

  _____  

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: 
_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at http://www.wwrug.org

Reply via email to