Ok.  I could possibly contribute 10% of that.  The only other thing that I 
could possibly offer is that we run LISTSERV here as well.  I have the 
privilege of requesting a listserv.  The big hang-up would be how to have 
“@arslist.org” to translate to here at ETSU and that it work both in that 
manner and for the server here.

Dustin Fawver
Sr. Help Desk Technician
Information Technology Services

P: 423-439-4648
itsh...@etsu.edu
[itslogo]<http://www.etsu.edu/helpdesk>

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Jason Miller
Sent: Friday, September 29, 2017 6:08 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [EXTERNAL] ADM: ARSlist Future 2017


*** This email does NOT originate from an ETSU person or service. ***
**
The renewal last year was just under $1000 USD.

Jason

On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 4:54 AM, Fawver, Dustin 
<faw...@mail.etsu.edu<mailto:faw...@mail.etsu.edu>> wrote:
**

I remember that there was some back-channel discussion in the past that 
resulted in the setup that is currently running.  Would you be willing to 
divulge what it would take for option 3?


Thanks!
Dustin Fawver
Sr. Help Desk Technician
Information Technology Services

P: 423-439-4648<tel:(423)%20439-4648>
itsh...@etsu.edu<mailto:itsh...@etsu.edu>
[1489002992830_itslogo.png]

________________________________
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
<arslist@ARSLIST.ORG<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>> on behalf of Jason Miller 
<jason.mil...@gmail.com<mailto:jason.mil...@gmail.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2017 1:46 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] ADM: ARSlist Future 2017

**
Hello everybody,

It is time again to make some decisions regarding the future of the ARSlist. 
Our LISTSERV (the software ARSlist runs on) license expires in a little over 30 
days. Dan, Misi and myself have been discussing where to go from here. We agree 
with the current (low) volume of posts that (Dan) continuing to pay for the 
ARSlist platform does not make much sense. Clearly the ARSlist is not providing 
the value it one was (when it was the only place to discuss Remedy topics).

The options for the future at this time appear to be:

  *   Move the ARSlist to a free mailing list platform. *
  *   Say goodbye to the ARSlist and shut it down all together.
  *   Money will come from somewhere to pay the license fee and the ARSlist 
lives on for at least another year.
There is a contingency with the first option. Assuming the platform the List 
moves to is not a hosted system in the cloud, Misi, who has been graciously 
hosting ARSlist LISTSERV on his server for the last year, will not be able to 
make a software switch until after the T3SMAC 
conference<http://tooltechtrain.com/> in November. If we give Misi a few days 
to hangout in Vegas after the conference, get home, and setup a new mail list 
system, we are looking at possibly a few week outage of the ARSlist while 
things transition. If we find a platform that is hosted and doesn't require 
shell access to Misi's server then I can work on the transition before the 
conference.

If anybody see additional options please let me know. Also I am open to honest 
feedback. At heart I know none of us want to see the ARSlist go, it has been 
here for us for many years. Shutting it down is not something to be taken 
lightly. However being practical, do we reject the idea of shutting down the 
List based on our feelings and not so much the value it is providing in 2017? 
Since this post is really a continuation of a conversation that started over a 
year ago, I wonder if maybe the time has actually come to retire the ARSlist?

Thank you,
Jason


_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_

_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"

Reply via email to