Hi Nisha, The situation is quiet similar to Out of the box HPD:Helpdesk archiving and its related table field entries for SHR:ConsolidatedLists (Correponds to ur second form). We actually were in a fix as well when we implemented the Archiving in our systems. In our case we chose to archive SHR:ConsolidatedList just for record sake and did not really use it that much. However if you do need these entries to be displayed in table field of archive form i think you should not be archiving your second form at all.
-Mudit On 4/1/07, Nisha Ramtri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
** Hello Listers, Today I tried to enable archiving of one of the forms being used in my organisation. This form has some table fields which have some data coming from some second regular form through some workflow. When I archived only the main form containing the table field and not the second regular form, then in the archived form I could see the data in the table. However, when I archived the second regular form (in addition to the main form), I could not see the data in the table of the archived main form. The data was however available in the second archived form. As per the documentation, the workflow does not get attached to the archived forms. -->So instead of actually modifying the workflow and enabling it also for the archived forms, how can I ensure that I can overcome this issue? -->Has anyone ever come across this kind of issue? If yes, how has it been overcome? -->Have I missed something else which needs to be taken care of so that such table fields are populated with the data when archived? I got some suggestions offline but I would appreciate if there were some more of them. It'll be a great help if you could throw some light and suggest something. Thanks! Rgds, Nisha Ramtri __20060125_______________________This posting was submitted with HTML in it___
_______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org ARSlist:"Where the Answers Are"
