Hi,

We have a requirement to enter?CI Names into Asset Managemen tthat are subject 
to change each time the asset is transferred.? The team also wants to have the 
CI Name equal to the unique name of the asset tag.

I am not for this method - however I was wondering has anybody tried this type 
of methodology.? Also, what your thoughts are regaring the CI Name.? My 
understanding is that the CI Name is used in the CMDB to identify assets so if 
the asset tag is JMR452 - that's not much of a naming convention.? And changing 
the CI Name everytime an asset is moved sounds like an administrative 
disaster.? I recommended a fixed naming convention.? Am I off base:?

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to