Hi Joe, Yes, there was one alias to remove from the Company Alias form which would otherwise cause the manufacturer import to fail on the Square D company.
It also turns out that if you import DSL data to the product catalog/DSL and then remove the PDL staging form data then subsequent uploads of DSL patch data can't be imported. This is because the import doesn't check if model/versions already exist when the staging data is validated so it tries to create duplicates and fails. Cheers Peter > _____ > > From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Joe DeSouza > Sent: 24 November 2008 23:42 > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Subject: Re: DSL Data Update Rant > > > > On the very early release of DSL, there were bugs that needed to be fixed > manually (delete a record) before applying a patch.. Did you do that? > > > > Joe > > > > _____ > > From: Peter Romain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > Sent: Monday, November 24, 2008 5:13:39 PM > Subject: DSL Data Update Rant > > Hi, > > <rant> > I thought DSL stood for Definitive Software Library. > > Why, then, when I update to DSL patch 9 from patch 8 do I get errors > because > some manufacturer names have changed and more errors because some software > product names have changed? > > It seems that 'definitive' means 'definitive until we change it' to the > DSL > data suppliers. > > Also, why, when I take the time to update the Tier 1-3 values in the DSL > does an update then put them back to the meaningless > software/application/third party value? > > The DSL doesn't impress me much! > > <\rant> > > Cheers > > Peter > > > > __Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" > html___ > _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor: www.rmsportal.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
