If you run each of the scenarios multiple times and average the times, do you still see a 25% (or 20%, depending on how you figure it) difference between 1 & 2 and 3 & 4?
Lyle -----Original Message----- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arsl...@arslist.org] On Behalf Of Jarl Grøneng Sent: Monday, August 17, 2009 2:01 PM To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Wierd behavior with Java API -> ar-server 2009/8/17 Lyle Taylor <tayl...@ldschurch.org>: > Jarl, > Your comment that the difference between 1 and 2 is due to one commit to the > database is incorrect. That end is the same - the difference is in the > network latency due to 1 vs 10,000 API calls across the network. That's the > exact same difference that you see between 3 & 4. > Did a new test-run, and the commit in example 2), with bulk transaction took approx 18 seconds. 2009-08-17 21:52:50,593 DEBUG [main] ARImport (ARImport.java:365) - Start bulk commit 2009-08-17 21:53:08,203 DEBUG [main] ARImport (ARImport.java:372) - End bulk create, sending all requests to AR Server The network latency should be very small since the client, server and database is on the same machine (as I wrote in my first email) It is 25% difference between 3-4 and 1-2 (16 seconds vs 20 seconds) -- Jarl _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org Platinum Sponsor:rmisoluti...@verizon.net ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"
