I tried adding both Dataset A and B to the Merge job but all that happened was 
that both datasets got copied to BMC.ASSET but not the relationship.

I am still working it and think I might have a fix. I will try on Monday when I 
get in.


On Feb 25, 2011, at 2:49 PM, Peter Romain wrote:

> **
> Which datasets have you specified as Source Datasets in the merge job?
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
> [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of sphilben
> Sent: 25 February 2011 15:54
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> Subject: Merging CIs with Children
> 
>  
> 
> **
> 
> Listers:
> 
>  
> 
> Does this make sense? I am using CMDB 7.6 to try and do the following with 
> two datasets.
> 
>  
> 
> Dataset A has 100 CIs
> Dataset B has 1000 CIs
> 
>  
> 
> Some of the CIs in Dataset B are related to some of the CIs in Dataset A
> 
>  
> 
> I want to merge all the CIs in A and the related CIs in B but not the 
> unrelated ones in B (don't care about them at this point). I have a lot of 
> unrelateds and I don't want to waste time processing them.
> 
>  
> 
> So I think I am supposed to do the following:
> 
>  
> 
> 1. Import Dataset A and Dataset B into the CMDB
> 2. ID Datasets A and B (this is new data so create ReconconciliationID)
> 3. Relate the relevant CIs in datasets A and B (records created in 
> HostedSystemComponents)
> 4. Merge the CIs in Dataset A to BMC.ASSET, and include the Child CIs I 
> already related using the "Related CIs in separate transactions" option on 
> the Merge action.
> 
>  
> 
> Step 4 is where it breaks down. When I run the Merge job it copies Dataset A 
> CIs to BMC.ASSET but not the related Children.
> 
>  
> 
> Am I doing it wrong? Or is what I am trying to do not possible? If you look 
> at page 98 of the "BMC Atrium 7.6.00 Normalization and Reconciliaton Guide" 
> it seems to imply that you can merge more than one thing at the same time:
> 
>  
> 
> "Merges instances specified by the attached Qualification Set, destination 
> CIs in weak relationships with those instances, and the relationships 
> themselves.
> 
>  
> 
> This option treats composite objects as one entity. For example, if your 
> Qualification set selects a computer system instance, it and its components 
> would all be merged. The individual CIs and relationships are merged in 
> separate database transactions."
> 
>  
> 
> Do I have to use a Qualification if I want all the CIs in Dataset A?
> 
>  
> 
> If anyone has any insights, please let me know.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> _attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
> 
> _attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_


_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to