What you say makes sense, except that Service Level Management includes OLAs, 
and it would be very useful to be able to break down the internal components of 
the work to determine what is causing the higher level SLAs to be violated.  
For example if you had a specific type of Change that always ended up violating 
SLAs, you could check the OLAs at the Task level and see what group is causing 
the problem and address it that way.

We have a process that involves some non-I.T. groups, one of which is 
notoriously slow.  As a result, if we could track the OLA-level work being done 
on these items at the Task level, we'd be able to exclude the non-I.T. groups 
and only monitor the specific tasks we have control over.  If we did it at the 
Change level, we would regularly be in violation because we have no real way to 
predict the amount of time that would occur.

Thanks,

Shawn Pierson
Remedy Developer | Southern Union

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Butera, Joseph
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 2:02 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: SLM 7.6 - Task Management?

**
Are not service level agreements made with customers or clients rather than 
internal support groups? Tasks can be children of incident, problem, or change 
requests. Of these, only incidents are concerned with service restoration 
within an agreed upon timeframe.  I think it would be difficult to establish 
contractual obligations on the resolution of problems or the implementation of 
change requests. Given that, I doubt BMC would provide such an out of the box 
integration.

My 2 cents,

Joe Butera

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Guillaume Rheault
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 2:20 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: SLM 7.6 - Task Management?

**
John Weigand,

>From the time Tauf posted this request to the time he figured the solution, 
>that's 4 hours. Take out an hour for lunch, that's 3 hours.
Why can't BMC just get this done quickly and incorporate task management into 
SLM? Is BMC so overwhelmed with red tape that this cannot be done?

This is truly ridiculous...

Guillaume
________________________________
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] on 
behalf of Weigand, John [john_weig...@bmc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 10:22 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: SLM 7.6 - Task Management?
**
Tauf,

SLM does not have an out-of-the-box integration to Task Management at this 
time.  You will have to treat it as a custom data source.

You should submit an RFE to ask for this integration.

-John

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Chowdhury, Tauf
Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2011 9:10 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: SLM 7.6 - Task Management?

**
All,
I'm venturing into SLM territory and have one question right away.
I see no choices out of the box to monitor the Task Management system. So for 
example, Tasks related to incidents or tasks related to changes/problems. Does 
this have to be added to SLM as a custom data source?

Tauf Chowdhury | Forest Laboratories, Inc.
Analyst, Service Management
Informatics-Infrastructure
Office: 631.858.7765
Mobile:646.483.2779


________________________________
This e-mail and its attachments may contain Forest Laboratories, Inc. 
proprietary information that is privileged, confidential or subject to 
copyright belonging to Forest Laboratories, Inc. This e-mail is intended solely 
for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If you are 
not the intended recipient of this e-mail, or the employee or agent responsible 
for delivering this e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified 
that any dissemination, distribution, copying or action taken in relation to 
the contents of and attachments to this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may 
be unlawful. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the 
sender immediately and permanently delete the original and any copy of this 
e-mail and any printout.
_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com<http://www.wwrug.com> ARSlist: "Where the Answers 
Are"_
_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_

Private and confidential as detailed here: 
http://www.sug.com/disclaimers/default.htm#Mail . If you cannot access the 
link, please e-mail sender.

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to