Excellent points, Peter.  Given that this data should be pretty standardized, 
maybe we could leverage ARS community power to fix this:  What about publishing 
the Product Catalog on a wiki or similar platform where we could all 
collaborate on it?


Kelly Logan, Sr. Systems Administrator (Remedy), GMS
ProQuest | 789 E. Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346 | Ann Arbor MI 48106-1346 
USA | 734.997.4777 
kelly.lo...@proquest.com
www.proquest.com 

ProQuest...Start here. 2010 InformationWeek 500 Top Innovator

Please consider the environment before printing this email. 

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
you have received this email in error please notify the sender, and delete the 
message from your computer.



-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Peter Romain
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2011 7:09 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: New Product Catalog Data Import - Disappointed!

Hi,

BMC just released new Product Catalog data based on ADDM discovery data.

I was hoping to use this data immediately as we need to reconcile ADDM data 
with other data sources (HP uCMDB, CiscoWorks and manual audit data).

I loaded the data only to find that it looks amateurish.

Specifically:
Data has the first character as upper case and the rest as lower. This means 
that we see companies like Bmc, Ibm, Hp, etc. The product name data is also the 
same. For reports this won't look good.

Then there are exceptions and possible duplicates such as the inclusion of both 
'Network associates' and 'Networks Associates' (note the capital 'A').

Although open to debate the customer here thinks the normalisation aliases are 
the wrong way around for companies like BMC (BMC Software converts to BMC), HP 
(Hewlett-Packard converts to Hp), etc.

The Tier 1-3 values are all the same. A suggestion of possible values would 
have been good.

The data only includes Product class data. The opportunity to include other 
classes has been missed (but I hope will come later).


The customer here has decided to analyse ADDM data themselves and create 
Product Catalog, Manufacturers and NE aliases.

The BMC data as it stands is as much help as the old DSL data was (did anyone 
really use this?). Maybe I was expecting too much!

Anyone else looked at this?

Cheers

Peter

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug11 
www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to