Try setting up the filters in the first filter guide with the characters `! at the end of the filter name. This will force the push fields to take place during phase 2 of the filter processing, which means that your later set fields/call guide actions will have the records available.
The Application-Release-Pending can be dangerous because it causes a commit to the database before the filter processing completes. This means that if an error occurs later, it will not roll back those transactions. Axton On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Anderson Debra (PRN) < debra_ander...@prn.com> wrote: > ** > > Hi Everyone,**** > > ** ** > > I am working a new function in our custom app (ARS 7.0) that involves > somewhat complex filter processing – at least for me J**** > > ** ** > > Basically when a user updates a record’s status to a certain value a filter > is run that calls a Filter Guide which has several filters some of these > also call filter guides that are in most cases doing table loop processing. > These filters will push new records into a new transaction form – these > records will need to processed at the end of the filter guide. My approach > was to have the final filters do the following steps to process the > transactions added during the previous filter guide steps**** > > **1) **Call Run Process Application-Release-Pending**** > > **2) **Call a final Filter Guide which would do a table loop on a table > based on the transaction form records just added.**** > > ** ** > > Does anyone have any experience using the Application-Release-Pending > command?**** > > Any suggestions for how to use and/or best method to troubleshoot?**** > > ** ** > > Also I have named the filters in my guides that are doing the push fields > to the transaction table with a `! prefix to try to ensure the pushed > records are available later in the workflow of the filter guide. However > not sure how the `! would work when it’s a filter that is part of a fairly > involved filter guide process.**** > > ** ** > > My results are unexpected – I would have expected either no rows to be > processed from the table loop or all rows but instead the loop processed one > row from the table when I added the Run Process Application-Release-Pending > and also processed one row when I removed the Run Process action.**** > > ** ** > > Thanks**** > > Debra**** > > ** ** > > Debra Anderson > *T* 415.808.9118 | *F* 415.808.3535 > 600 Harrison St • San Francisco, CA • 94107 > > *PRN** |** *media where & when it matters > > This e-mail (including any attachments) is meant for only the intended > recipient of the transmission, and may include confidential information. If > you are not the intended recipient or you received this e-mail in error, any > review, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this e-mail is > strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please > notify the sender immediately by telephone at (415) 808-3500 or by return > e-mail and delete this e-mail, along with any attachments and copies, from > your system. Thank you. > > **** > > ** ** > _attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
