Debra, You say: "If any of the push actions fail a subsequent filter does the following"
Are you using an Error Handler filter to process the "fail" condition? If so, once your error handler filter handles the error, the system considers the error handled and processing continues as if there were no error. Phasing is also affected. Check the Workflow Objects guide for details (I only 7.1 docs handy, so I don't have a page # for your version). Hope that helps, Thad On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 3:49 PM, Anderson Debra (PRN) < debra_ander...@prn.com> wrote: > ** > > Hi Everyone! > > **** > > Hoping folks on the list with more experience might be able to explain > unexpected filter processing behavior I am seeing.**** > > We are using 7.0 version**** > > ** ** > > Here is an overview of how my workflow is setup**** > > ** ** > > 1 – Filter 1A fires on Modify on Form_A – Note this filter name is using > thte `! syntax for override filter phasing.**** > > Actions are in this:**** > > Set fields**** > > Call Guide 2A using server-side table loop**** > > Call Guide 2B**** > > ** ** > > Filter 2A – seems to work as expected (based on review of filter log). It > calls several filters that loop thru table entries again using `! syntax. > Each entry in the table results in a Push field action to two forms B & C. > If any of the push actions fail a subsequent filter does the following *** > * > > 1 – Run Process command to run unix script to add entry to log > server file**** > > 2 - Message action of type Error is reported to end-user**** > > As expected after this error occurs none of the push field changes are > applied to the database – this is what I want to happen J**** > > ** ** > > However after the error occurs the top level filter still calls Guide 2B (I > see this in the filter log after the error is logged) however the actions in > the Guide are not fully executed but the one a Run Process action on a unix > shell command does execute but after this runs the next actions which are > Set/Push fields are not executed.**** > > ** ** > > Any ideas why my 2nd Call Guide action would execute after the first Guide > called produces an error – my expectation was that if the first Guide > produced an error the filter that called the guide would stop processing all > together and the 2nd Guide would not be executed at all.**** > > ** ** > > Any thoughts?**** > > ** ** > > Thanks**** > > Debra**** > > ** ** > > Debra Anderson > *T* 415.808.9118 | *F* 415.808.3535 > 600 Harrison St • San Francisco, CA • 94107 > > *PRN** |** *media where & when it matters > > This e-mail (including any attachments) is meant for only the intended > recipient of the transmission, and may include confidential information. If > you are not the intended recipient or you received this e-mail in error, any > review, use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this e-mail is > strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please > notify the sender immediately by telephone at (415) 808-3500 or by return > e-mail and delete this e-mail, along with any attachments and copies, from > your system. Thank you. > > **** > > ** ** > _attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
