Is there a way to accomplish what he is asking for by configuring the ardb.conf 
file?  I would think that the index could be maintained that way via Remedy.  
Just curious.

Sean

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Axton
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 12:53 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: Bitmap indexes vs Regular indexes

** Also keep in mind that certain form modifications will drop those indexes.  
If that happens you will need to recreate the indexes.  It used to be that the 
alteration of the precision of a decimal field, or the modification of a 
currency field would trigger this.  Not sure if this still holds true.

Axton Grams
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Rick Cook 
<remedyr...@gmail.com<mailto:remedyr...@gmail.com>> wrote:
** Well, the immediate question is best answered by whether fast submits or 
fast searches are more important.  That's a form-by-form argument, and you have 
to balance your users' needs and potential SLAs for performance in there as you 
see best.

The longer-term question is about the viability of having your indexes 
maintained at the DB level.  I think if I were having some there, I would want 
to have them all there - if that made sense from a performance standpoint, and 
if they could be maintained in sync with application customizations.  That's a 
lot of work - is the potential gain worth it?

Guillaume's advice is sound.

Rick

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Guillaume Rheault 
<guilla...@dcshq.com<mailto:guilla...@dcshq.com>> wrote:
**
Hi Ron,

My thoughts are these bitmap indexes should be created at the database level, 
so that Remedy is not aware of them, because all Remedy created indexes are 
"standard" (i.e. b-tree indexes).
After these indexes are created, the DBA can profile the overall performance 
again, to see if the expected benefits are there. Otherwise, the bitmap indexes 
should be dropped and the indexes created as b-tree through Remedy.

When you migrate the forms between environments, you need to remember to 
re-create these bitmap indexes at the database level.

What BMC is saying that bitmap indexes are longer to write depends on the level 
of concurrency on the update of the bitmap index: it may or may not be an issue 
in your environment

take a look at this article here:

http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/articles/sharma-indexes-093638.html

Guillaume
________________________________
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[arslist@ARSLIST.ORG<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>] on behalf of Ron Tavares 
[ron.tava...@gmail.com<mailto:ron.tava...@gmail.com>]
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2011 9:10 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>
Subject: Bitmap indexes vs Regular indexes
**
Good Morning List,

I am a Remedy guy, not a DB guy,.. so I am looking for some help from the DBAs 
on the List.  Recently, our DBA ran a performance analysis of our Remedy DB and 
came back with 9 fields that are recommended for indexing.  3 of those fields 
are recommended to have bitmap indexes.  This cannot be created in Remedy.  So 
we can either create these as standard indexes instead of bitmap,  so that the 
Remedy system is aware of them, (this is what BMC is recommending).  OR, we can 
have the DBA create them at the DB level as the recommended bitmap indexes, but 
then Remedy is not aware they exist.

BMC is saying that bitmap indexes have a downfall in that they take a lot 
longer to write to.  Our DBA is saying that we will not get the searching 
performance improvement we seek unless we use the bitmap indexes.

Any thoughts from the pros?

Thanks in advance,
.ron
_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com<http://www.wwrug.com> ARSlist: "Where the Answers 
Are"_
_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com<http://www.wwrug.com> ARSlist: "Where the Answers 
Are"_

_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com<http://www.wwrug.com> ARSlist: "Where the Answers 
Are"_

_attend WWRUG11 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug11 www.wwrug.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to