David,

(I think I did mention I have been on this topic for 10+ years???)


Yes - I understand your puzzlement and possible frustration.

In Minnesota -- there was a company that was bundling frozen steaks - with a 
car windshield replacement.
(Eventually a law was passed to prevent that kind of thing)


For me -- I feel Request Management -- is WAY BEYOND an IT thing -- and should 
not be considered part of ITSM. 


Request Management is a business concept - which happens to be commonly 
delivered by an infrastructure Change - or possibly the reporting of some sort 
of Incident. (And I feel it is commonly done that way - because IT is usually 
the shopper for software)

However -- if I think of some of our other university clients -- that is quite 
a small % of the types of Requests they look to make available.


Things like:

Request a transcript
Report a theft
Schedule a conference room
Register a car
Register a visitor
Report a broken window

(It is probably a 20 to 1 ratio of non-IT to IT)

And TONS of others....


None of those are ITSM concepts - and are not (should not) be resolvable by 
Incident/Change management. 

So - therefore the concept of "Work Orders" comes up. However, in BMC that is a 
slippery slope -- as that translates to WICKED HIGH LICENSING COSTS.  Now your 
people working Work Orders (admissions people, facilities, parking, resident 
assistants, etc...) need Remedy Generalist licenses (or some name like that). 

[[[ 
You will probably give them floating licenses as they don't log in that often 
to work a Work Order. However, those same people will come in and request 
things, report things, etc... (Ooops -- you just used your license -- even 
though you are not modifying anything (double darn) -- then the license police 
come around and -- well get out your wallet!!!
]]]

I remember somebody saying Kinetic costs more $$$ -- I don't think that is true.


So -- rock/hardplace...

I feel it is appropriate to start thinking differently to approach Request 
Management issues.

And I personally don't think connecting Request Management as part of an ITSM 
suite is appropriate.



Kinetic Request - is designed to be an Enterprise Request Management 
Application - and as a result - does not have concepts of Incidents/Change 
etc...


We treat Incident/Change and ??? - as possible fulfillment targets behind a 
request. (Just as we would consider your HR system, finance system, facilities 
system)


So -- if somebody asks for a transcript (via Kinetic Request) -- we would send 
that to your admissions dept (or wherever appropriate) -- it would however -- 
never become an Incident or a Change...


(I debated putting this in -- but it is true)
On the topic of lawyers: my personal experience is the (product not to be 
mentioned) is the #1 product produced by (company not to be mentioned) that has 
lawsuits and people and companies fired. Too bad nobody likes to mention that 
stuff. BTW - it seems to get wrapped up in the "agreement" - that it is not to 
be discussed :(


Also -- I personally invite you to our first ever users conference: KEG 
(Kinetic Enthusiasts Group).
(See my signature below -- for links)
It will be a great place to ask "how do you like X", "What don't you like about 
X", etc... 
Hopefully it will help you to be pointed in the right direction. If SRM is 
right for you -- awesome... If it is not -- maybe Kinetic is good for you 
(double awesome)... And -- maybe a custom solution is right for you. (darn, 
talk expensive)


And if Kinetic cannot make you happy (in it's current version) - let me know 
(directly) -- and I will see that the product will be improved to meet your 
needs - in the next version.
(However -- I would be surprised if our version that has been shipping for 2 
years doesn't fit your needs) (Is it perfect? no -- Does it meet the needs? 
typically-yes) 




-John



On Oct 28, 2011, at 3:22 PM, David Burdette wrote:

**
Thanks very much to all who have responded to my question; I have been able to 
mine substantial useful information out of the discussions.
 
I am a bit puzzled on one point; and I imagine my puzzlement is only a symptom 
of my lack of familiarity with this whole constellation of topics.
 
The puzzlement: some responders have referred to “SRM” as if it were somehow an 
optional/competing product, which should be considered as one possible 
alternative, amongst a field of options.
 
I’m a management-type; I have a development team whom I’m supervising in a 
roll-out of a product we purchased, which I know as “Remedy ITSM Suite.” It was 
my impression that what I’m calling “SRM” – in the context of this list, and 
this inquiry – is a standard component of the “Remedy ITSM Suite” product, and 
is the component provided by BMC for users to initiate ‘tickets’ of various 
types into the Remedy system. 
 
Since I *thought* this was a “Remedy-specific” list, I thought my question, and 
its context, would be unambiguous. But it seems I’m reading about the relative 
merits of competing alternatives, and that (what I think of as) “Remedy/SRM” 
may not even EXIST.  It may be a separate optional product, which may, or may 
not, be a normal part of a “Remedy” (whatever that is – I used to think I 
knew…) installation.
 
I find myself bewildered and distressed, that I may have a completely erroneous 
concept of the product I *thought* I bought. But since we bought it from a 
3rd-party (not BMC), and the “consultants” (of whom I’ve seen TOO MANY) are all 
independent contractors working (loosely) for the 3rd-party vendor, I may not 
have accurate information. In fact, I may have nothing but clever 
sales-pitches. Lawyers, politicians, vendors, and consultants… need I say more?
 
I’m not even sure, at this point, what my question is – if I *have* a question. 
 
But I do think I have some direction to share with my developers on how to do 
“SRM – Colors & Branding.” And I thank you for that.
 
 
Regards,
-dpb-
 
David Burdette; Assistant Director, Computing Infrastructure Services
University of Florida; Computing and Networking Services
www.cns.ufl.edu : Voice 352.273-1309 : Fax 352.392-1440
 
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Nathan Aker
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 3:30 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: SRM - Colors & 'Branding'?
 
**
Let it be noted I was not endorsing SRM over Kinetic, nor the merits of said 
functionality.   I was simply noting an option to investigate in SRM to address 
the question posed.
 
I personally still find it shocking that it took 3 or 4 major versions of SRM 
to get beyond the 10 question maximum for a service request.  Nevermind the 
incredibly high complexity to capability ratio.  And WHY CAN’T I NEST 
CONDITIONAL QUESTIONS PEOPLE!!!!!!
 
Nathan Aker
ITSM Solution Architect
McAfee, Inc.

 
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of John Sundberg
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 11:32 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: SRM - Colors & 'Branding'?
 
**
 
 
 
My experience (from what our customers ask for)
 
Logo swapping and color replacement != branding...
 
 
Compare:
http://www.bk.com/
http://www.mcdonalds.com/us/en/home.html
 
http://www.homedepot.com/
http://www.lowes.com/
 
 
 
And - not only that -- but the larger the company -- the more 
brands/themes/catalogs they want.
 
So - not only do they want theming -- they want multi-theming, etc...
 
So - if you are looking to have a Service Catalog/Request Management 
application actually be an extension of your company -- Kinetic is a good route.
 
And I get this info -- from the people who already tried to implement the 
alternative. 
 
I have found - the half-life of serious Request Management projects is about 1 
year. (And that is - if they actually get past "launching")
 
You will find if you are successful or not - in that time frame.
 
Of which -- when serious customers have finally come to the realization that 
the "bundled" service catalog does not cut the mustard -- then the come to us. 
 
Now of course -- you also get the drag-on of (next version will do X) -- blah 
blah blah...
 
Kinetic has had theming (proper) since DAY 1... 
 
It was designed for it.
 
 
 
 
 
BTW - All the big vendors ITSM suites come with a bundled Request Management - 
of which I find few companies actually like. (I am not just talking about our 
favorite one)
 
 
 
 
You see that nice shiny floating thing in the water???
 
It comes bundled with a "treble-hook" -- beware...
 
 
 
-John
 
 
 
 
 
On Oct 28, 2011, at 10:30 AM, Nathan Aker wrote:

**
Not sure what version you’re on, but look into the “Skin” feature that allows 
you to brand and color SRM forms basically leveraging CSS.  Think it was a new 
feature around about 7.6.03.  Nate.
 
Nathan Aker
ITSM Solution Architect
McAfee, Inc.
Direct: 972.963.7611
Mobile: 469.644.7402
 
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of David Burdette
Sent: Friday, October 28, 2011 9:34 AM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: SRM - Colors & 'Branding'?
 
**
We’re near launch of a new Remedy system. We plan to use the SRM 
(“ServiceRequestConsole/enduser”) as the ‘front door’ for all our tickets. 
 
We’d like to be able to do some tweaks on it, to ‘re-brand’ it to look more 
like our other web pages. This would involve such things as logo, colors, 
banner, & footer.
 
We’ve asked around and been told the only thing that can be changed is the 
logo-graphic (top-left corner). I just find it difficult to believe that other 
companies aren’t doing more in the way of custom ‘skins’ for the SRM 
user-interface. 
 
Does anyone have any suggestions they can offer regarding how we might 
accomplish this?
 
Regards,
-dpb-
 
David Burdette; Assistant Director, Computing Infrastructure Services
University of Florida; Computing and Networking Services
www.cns.ufl.edu : Voice 352.273-1309 : Fax 352.392-1440
 
 
_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
 
--
John Sundberg

Save the Date! First Annual KEG - Kinetic Enthusiasts Group
Feb. 29th - Mar. 2nd 2012 in Denver CO
 
For more information click here - KEG

Kinetic Data, Inc.
"Building a Better Service Experience"
Recipient of:
 
WWRUG10 Best Customer Service/Support Award
WWRUG09 Innovator of the Year Award

john.sundb...@kineticdata.com
651.556.0930  I  www.kineticdata.com
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
_attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_

--
John Sundberg

Save the Date! First Annual KEG - Kinetic Enthusiasts Group
Feb. 29th - Mar. 2nd 2012 in Denver CO

For more information click here - KEG

Kinetic Data, Inc.
"Building a Better Service Experience"
Recipient of:

WWRUG10 Best Customer Service/Support Award
WWRUG09 Innovator of the Year Award

john.sundb...@kineticdata.com
651.556.0930  I  www.kineticdata.com











_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to