Thanks:: Don't Worry we will be testing soon..
and I am sure BMC will know about it.. any errors according to OAST..
thanks..

On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Mueller, Doug <doug_muel...@bmc.com>wrote:

> **
>
> Patrick,****
>
> ** **
>
> This does not change the 508 compliance of the app.****
>
> ** **
>
> Flash in this case is used only for decoration of the screen.  It does not
> convey any data.  Rounded****
>
> corners, gradient background color, vertical static text (the static text
> still reads correctly for the screen****
>
> readers it just doesn't display vertically on the screen) are not data
> sharing mechanisms.****
>
> ** **
>
> So, with or without this option turned on, there is no Section 508
> (accessibility for individuals with****
>
> disabilities laws from the US government) issue involved in this situation.
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> You are correct that if there is a portion of the product that is
> displaying data that is using Flash to do that****
>
> display and there is no other way to get that data and the Flash component
> does not interact with****
>
> screen readers to communicate that information, there is a Section 508
> issue.****
>
> ** **
>
> It is just that the use of Flash in this situation does not fall into that
> category and it is only used for a****
>
> cosmetic result on the screen.****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> So, no Section 508 involvement either way with this option.****
>
> ** **
>
> Doug Mueller****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Pat Zandi
> *Sent:* Monday, November 14, 2011 4:41 PM
>
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: BMC's Future on the horizon.. IMHO****
>
>  ** **
>
> ** ****
>
> Does this also make it 508 compliant. Cause flash is an automatic failure?
>
> Sent from my iPhone****
>
>
> On Nov 14, 2011, at 18:50, "Mueller, Doug" <doug_muel...@bmc.com> wrote:**
> **
>
>  ** ****
>
> Claire,****
>
>  ****
>
> OK, so I should have had the specifics in the first message.   And, it is
> a setting that is buried within****
>
> config files and not available through a UI screen as I thought.****
>
>  ****
>
> Anyway, it is a config setting for the mid-tier so you need to do this for
> each mid-tier in your****
>
> environment.****
>
>  ****
>
> Please find below the details:****
>
>  ****
>
> **1)      **Open *config.properties* file under C:\Program Files\BMC
> Software\ARSystem\midtier\WEB-INF\classes****
>
> **2)      **Change arsystem.flash.enable_ui_rendering=false and save
> changes.****
>
> **3)      **Restart Tomcat.****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> The setting in #2 will be set to true in a default deployment.  Set to
> false to not use flash for the three****
>
> capabilities (rounded corners, gradient colors, and vertical text).  It
> will change the UI display and you****
>
> have to choose whether it is a problem or not.****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> Again, this is only if you have an environment that is IE9 and FlashPlayer
> 10.3.  This will turn off these****
>
> features for any IE environment – no other browser is affected or
> controlled by this setting.  But, it will****
>
> be to all versions of IE and not just IE9 so you will lose these three
> capabilities across IE versions.****
>
>  ****
>
> I hope this gives you what you need.****
>
>  ****
>
> Doug Mueller****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Sanford, Claire
> *Sent:* Monday, November 14, 2011 2:56 PM
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: BMC's Future on the horizon.. IMHO****
>
>  ****
>
> ** ****
>
> *Where do I go to turn this off?  *****
>
>  ****
>
> *5)       Go to the System config settings and set the option that turns
> off the use of Flash for these *****
>
> *three capabilities – you will not get rounded corners, vertical text, or
> gradient colors but you will *****
>
> *not loose any other functionality or capability within the system.  It
> is a cosmetic affect*****
>
>  ****
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [
> mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG <arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>] On Behalf Of pritch
> Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 1:18 PM
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> Subject: Re: BMC's Future on the horizon.. IMHO****
>
>  ****
>
> And of course you're making the assumption we have control over the items
> in your workaround.  Quite often we don't.****
>
>  ****
>
> ----- Original Message -----****
>
> From: "Doug Mueller" <doug_muel...@bmc.com>****
>
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG****
>
> Sent: Friday, November 11, 2011 1:53:35 PM****
>
> Subject: Re: BMC's Future on the horizon.. IMHO****
>
>  ****
>
> ** ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> Everyone, ****
>
>  ****
>
>   ****
>
>  ****
>
> What Chris describes here is a new discovery that is unique to IE9 where
> something has changed in ****
>
>  ****
>
> the IE implementation.  As part of the model that BMC uses for the AR
> System, we support the ****
>
>  ****
>
> specified versions of products "or later".  In this case, IE9 was not
> available when the current version ****
>
>  ****
>
> was released (7.6.04 was released in January 2011 and IE9 in March 2011).
> ****
>
>  ****
>
>   ****
>
>  ****
>
> The product is fully functional with IE9.  However, we have discovered an
> interaction issue that causes ****
>
>  ****
>
> a performance problem with IE9.  We are working with both Microsoft and
> Adobe on this issue to see ****
>
>  ****
>
> if can be resolved.  In addition, some redesign of the approach has mostly
> eliminated the problem from ****
>
>  ****
>
> the next major release (but that strategy cannot be backported to the
> current release). ****
>
>  ****
>
>   ****
>
>  ****
>
> So, enough of the overall philosophy, let's look at this situation. ****
>
>  ****
>
>   ****
>
>  ****
>
> There are a number of UI features that we added in recent releases.  Some
> of them were not supported ****
>
>  ****
>
> on specific browsers so we had to find alternatives for supporting the
> capability.  Specifically, there are ****
>
>  ****
>
> three features: rounded corners, gradient colors, and vertical text.
> These three capabilities could not ****
>
>  ****
>
> be supported in IE natively because the capability was not present.  To
> allow these capabilities, we ****
>
>  ****
>
> incorporated the use of Flash for IE.  All of the other browsers – Safari,
> Firefox, and even the other ****
>
>  ****
>
> used but unsupported browsers like Chrome – have the necessary support.
> So, the workaround was ****
>
>  ****
>
> used only for IE environments. ****
>
>  ****
>
>   ****
>
>  ****
>
> Everything works fine for IE6, IE7, and IE8 but with IE9, something has
> changed so that there is now a ****
>
>  ****
>
> performance cost for the workaround.   This is what we are working to find
> out what the issue is with ****
>
>  ****
>
> the other vendors. ****
>
>  ****
>
>   ****
>
>  ****
>
> Now, there are several options: ****
>
>  ****
>
>   ****
>
>  ****
>
> 1)       The performance issues is not really affecting you so do nothing
> ****
>
>  ****
>
> 2)       Use a browser other than IE ****
>
>  ****
>
> 3)       Use a version of IE before IE9  (for example, use IE8) ****
>
>  ****
>
> 4)       Use FlashPlayer 10.2 or earlier (the problem has been isolated to
> the combination of IE9 using ****
>
> FlashPlayer 10.3, or later unless a fix is added later) ****
>
>  ****
>
> 5)       Go to the System config settings and set the option that turns
> off the use of Flash for these ****
>
> three capabilities – you will not get rounded corners, vertical text, or
> gradient colors but you will ****
>
> not loose any other functionality or capability within the system.  It is
> a cosmetic affect ****
>
>  ****
>
>   ****
>
>  ****
>
>   ****
>
>  ****
>
>   ****
>
>  ****
>
> So, in summary…. ****
>
>  ****
>
>   ****
>
>  ****
>
> This may affect you ONLY IF you ****
>
>  ****
>
>   ****
>
>  ****
>
> n   Run IE9 as your browser ****
>
>  ****
>
> n   Use FlashPlayer 10.3 or later ****
>
>  ****
>
> n   Leave the system config setting to use Flash for these features turned
> on (the default) ****
>
>  ****
>
>   ****
>
>  ****
>
> Otherwise, this issue does not have any affect on your system.  And, it
> will affect only users that have ****
>
>  ****
>
> this combination as their client – other users on the same system without
> this combination will not ****
>
>  ****
>
> be affected. ****
>
>  ****
>
>   ****
>
>  ****
>
> There are several options (which may or may not be possible in your
> environment) to eliminate the ****
>
>  ****
>
> problem immediately. ****
>
>  ****
>
>   ****
>
>  ****
>
> BMC is continuing to work with the vendors on this problem to see we can
> find out why the problem ****
>
>  ****
>
> suddenly showed up with this combination of technology and to see if we
> can eliminate the issue from ****
>
>  ****
>
> future releases with alternate designs or approaches. ****
>
>  ****
>
>   ****
>
>  ****
>
>   ****
>
>  ****
>
> I hope this explanation has been helpful both for this specific issue and
> to show a case in action of the ****
>
>  ****
>
> "or later" support strategy. ****
>
>  ****
>
>   ****
>
>  ****
>
> Doug Mueller ****
>
>  ****
>
>   ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [
> mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG <arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>] On Behalf Of strauss ***
> *
>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2011 10:39 AM ****
>
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG ****
>
> Subject: Re: BMC's Future on the horizon.. IMHO ****
>
>  ****
>
>   ****
>
>  ****
>
> ** ****
>
>  ****
>
> We can hope; the dialog performance problems that we have been
> experiencing on production with ITSM 7.6.04.01 Incidents in IE9 have now
> been tracked down specifically to flash, and confirmed in my testing. ****
>
>  ****
>
>   ****
>
>  ****
>
> Christopher Strauss, Ph.D. ****
>
> Call Tracking Administration Manager ****
>
> University of North Texas Computing & IT Center ****
>
> http://itsm.unt.edu/ ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [
> mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG <arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>] On Behalf Of patrick
> zandi ****
>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2011 12:03 PM ****
>
> To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG ****
>
> Subject: BMC's Future on the horizon.. IMHO ****
>
>  ****
>
>   ****
>
>  ****
>
> **
> http://www.zdnet.com/blog/networking/flash-is-dead-long-live-html5/1633?tag=nl.e539
> ****
>
>  ****
>
> BMC's Future.. ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> -- ****
>
> Patrick Zandi ****
>
> _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ ****
>
>  ****
>
> _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ _attend
> WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ ****
>
>  ****
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________________
> ****
>
> UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org****
>
> attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"****
>
>  ****
>
> _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ ****
>
> _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ ****
>
> _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ ****
>  _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_
>



-- 
Patrick Zandi

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"

Reply via email to