Nithin,
What is the make of your Load balancer. We have seen such issues with F5 LB and a proxy. F5 load balancer has an issue with Session persistence/Session affinity. Please try the following: If your LB is F5 and you use proxy. Involve the admins who have setup the LB for you for creating the One Connect profile. http://support.f5.com/kb/en-us/products/big-ip_ltm/manuals/product/ltm_configuration_guide_10_0_0/ltm_persist_profiles.html * Refer to the following known issue when F5 is used with a Proxy. The Request-URI header in an HTTP request stores certain session data. Occasionally, however, for Cookie and Universal persistence types specifically, the BIG-IP system ignores the session data in this header, and sends requests to an unexpected node. For example, this issue can occur when clients send requests to a virtual server through an internet proxy device. You can prevent this problem by creating a OneConnect profile, and assigning both the OneConnect profile and the persistence profile to the virtual server. * The suggested F5 solution for making F5 Load Balancer work correctly with a Proxy is to create an OneConnect profile and applying both the OneConnect profile and the persistence profile to the virtual server. Regards, Ravi -----Original Message----- From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Axton Sent: 23 November 2011 21:11 To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG Subject: Re: Loadbalancer issue in Mid-Tier 7.6.04 SP2 What kind of load balancer are you using? Cisco, BigIP? Did you look at the midtier/web logs to see if requests from a single browser are bouncing between multiple nodes? Axton On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Nithin Vinod Kumar <nithin.vinod.ku...@gmail.com<mailto:nithin.vinod.ku...@gmail.com>> wrote: > ** All, > > We have configured the sticky bit for cookie on midtier Loadbalancer. > > But still we are getting the same issue. > > Please suggest if any changes need to be done on the loadbalancer or > in our application. > > Thanks, > Nithin > > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 6:29 AM, Nithin Vinod Kumar > <nithin.vinod.ku...@gmail.com<mailto:nithin.vinod.ku...@gmail.com>> wrote: >> >> All, >> >> We are working on the sticky bit on the loadbalancer now. >> As of now, When one of the servers is brought down then the LB >> redirects to the mid tier that is up and running. >> Lets hope setting the sticky flag solves it altogether. >> >> Thanks, >> Nithin >> >> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 4:31 AM, John Baker >> <jba...@javasystemsolutions.com<mailto:jba...@javasystemsolutions.com>> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hello >>> >>> Do you have the sticky flag set on the LB? Mid Tier does not support >>> session replication (although I wish it would). >>> >>> >>> John >>> >>> >>> ____________________________________________________________________ >>> ___________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at >>> www.arslist.org<http://www.arslist.org> attend wwrug12 >>> www.wwrug12.com<http://www.wwrug12.com> ARSList: "Where the >>> Answers Are" >> > > _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com<http://www.wwrug.com> ARSlist: "Where the > Answers Are"_ _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org<http://www.arslist.org> attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com<http://www.wwrug12.com> ARSList: "Where the Answers Are" _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
