Bladelogic BCA and BSA do as well...
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Mike Tomasiewicz (ConAgra Foods) < mike.tomasiew...@conagrafoods.com> wrote: > ** > > Irina,**** > > ** ** > > It does support the relationships you are talking about. All servers are > categorized as BMC_ComputerSystem CIs, the VMs are related to the Physical > Host with a child dependency relationship. Tools like BMC’s ADDM do all of > this magic for you. J**** > > ** ** > > .: Mike T :.**** > > ** ** > > *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto: > arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *irina solarcuka > *Sent:* Wednesday, December 14, 2011 6:22 AM > *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG > *Subject:* ITSM Suite**** > > ** ** > > ** **** > > Hello,**** > > **** > > I've got the question about BMC ITSM Suite. **** > > I would like to know is it possible to store data about > virtualized platforms and at the same time about phyzical equipments in > CMDB.**** > > So that phyzical equipments would related not only between themself but > with virtual platforms too. Does CMDB data structure support this two type > of data relationships?**** > > **** > > Best regards,**** > > Irina**** > > **** > > _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ **** > _attend WWRUG12 www.wwrug.com ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are"_ > -- Patrick Zandi _______________________________________________________________________________ UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org attend wwrug12 www.wwrug12.com ARSList: "Where the Answers Are"
