If you have access to the database you can run a query to find that out

Something like   
   select f.FieldID, s.Name   
   from Field f, ARSchema s   
   Where f.SCHEMAID=s.SCHEMAID   
     and (SELECT MIN(p.GroupID) from Field_Permissions p WHERE 
p.SCHEMAID=f.SCHEMAID and p.FIELDID=f.FIELDID) IS NULL



-----Original Message-----
From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Joe Castleman
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 12:47 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Mostly resolved Re: Write permissions errors with read (floating) 
license

Thanks Doug, you nailed it.  (Sound of palm slapping forehead, and/or egg 
running down face)  We changed server hardware, and have since discovered that 
some of the fields on the new server are missing permissions.  The database had 
been ported over from the old server, so ostensibly the objects would have been 
the same.  But somehow, the old permissions were completely missing from 
certain fields.  (That all happened before I arrived on the scene -- all I can 
tell is that no one had modified those objects in the meantime.)  I took it for 
granted that the object defs would be the same on both servers, but apparently 
(at least in this case) this was a reckless assumption.

Only a few fields have the issue; I haven't found any pattern as to how or why. 
 Furthermore I haven't found an instance where some of the permissions were 
missing and some were retained -- they're either all there or they're all 
missing.

So, this leads me to another question -- is there a quick and/or easy way to 
identify all fields (in any and all forms) that do not have any permissions at 
all?  (I don't have access to Migrator, though I recall it just tells you that 
there's a difference in permissions -- not necessarily what those differences 
are.)

Thanks again,

Joe



_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"

Reply via email to