I would have hoped it would have been a part of an ARS service pack since it's 
a potential security risk overall, but I'm on 8.1 Patch 2 on the system where 
this happened so it makes sense that it was addressed as a part of an ITSM 
service pack.

Thanks,

Shawn Pierson
Remedy Developer | Energy Transfer

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Mitcham, Ross
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 1:22 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
Subject: Re: ITSM 7.6.4 Defect with Double Quotes

**
This was addressed in a service pack I believe (to encode and decode " and ; 
from certain data )

Regards,

From: Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) 
[mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] On Behalf Of Pierson, Shawn
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2014 1:54 PM
To: arslist@ARSLIST.ORG<mailto:arslist@ARSLIST.ORG>
Subject: ITSM 7.6.4 Defect with Double Quotes

**
Good afternoon,

I thought I'd run this past you all.  With BMC moving toward using a lot more 
run process types of workflow, I've noticed several things failing and I wanted 
to see if anyone has identified a good fix other than us customers doing a full 
code review of ITSM and building error handling code into their stuff.

For example, my user has an Incident with a summary of something like:

This is a "test" where I am testing.

When the user goes to create a related Change Request from that Incident, it 
errors out when trying to save the Change Request.  It appears to start from 
the beginning in the active link INT:CHGHPD:INC:CreateAssociation_Change_003 
where it sets a field to do a PERFORM-ACTION-SEND-EVENT action, then sends the 
contents of that field (including quotation marks which are not escaped out) to 
actually run.  The result is that my user gets a Change Request screen open, 
but it doesn't set all of the fields that would be set if there weren't double 
quotes, and he is unable to save the CRQ because it is missing the Incident 
Number and generates an error trying to create the Change Association record.

I'm going to test this same thing in 8.1 to see if anything has been done about 
it there, but it seems like a potential security risk in addition to just 
causing users trouble.  I wonder if I can execute batch files from there?

Thanks,

Shawn Pierson
Remedy Developer | Energy Transfer

Private and confidential as detailed 
here<http://www.energytransfer.com/mail_disclaimer.aspx>. If you cannot access 
hyperlink, please e-mail sender.
_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
_ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_

Private and confidential as detailed here: 
http://www.energytransfer.com/mail_disclaimer.aspx .  If you cannot access the 
link, please e-mail sender.

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"

Reply via email to