Thanks Shawn,

Ahhh ... definitely ITSM related.  I have no RBE: forms.

We have alot of email formats but they are handled in filters.  Always
looking for a better way !

Thanks,
Susan


On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Pierson, Shawn <
shawn.pier...@energytransfer.com> wrote:

> **
>
> Rules Based Email.
>
>
>
> It probably has a different official name but the forms are prefixed with
> RBE.  Basically I built (then a colleague improved upon) two custom email
> integrations that were in use up until 7.6.4.  The first was email-based
> approvals, which I could almost accuse BMC of copying except their
> underlying code is completely different from mine, and the second was the
> ability to create and update Incidents (along with multiple inboxes tied to
> different Incident Templates.)
>
>
>
> With 8.1, we decided to try to be more out of the box on incoming emails,
> so we've used the Rules Based Email stuff in 8.1 to create and update
> Incidents, and we've built some very custom rules with slight custom code
> to handle inbound email approvals (the out of the box 8.1 functionality is
> basically on the level of the first version I built, which doesn't handle
> all the cool features we've added to handle attachments, justifications,
> alternates, etc.)
>
>
>
> My problem is, for various reasons within my organization we have
> difficulty with the source data that feeds into CTM:People being accurate,
> so sometimes we'll get a People record with a valid email address but not
> one that the user users because it's not from their primary domain.  Or we
> may get a new hire that isn't yet set up in such a way that Remedy knows
> they have an email address yet even though they're sitting at their desk
> firing off emails to create Incidents.
>
>
>
> If you're curious about how well documented it is, take a look at this
> Troubleshooting section:
> https://docs.bmc.com/docs/display/public/servicedesk81/Troubleshooting+email+record+creation+and+updates
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> *Shawn Pierson *
>
> Remedy Developer | Energy Transfer
>
>
>
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Susan Palmer
> *Sent:* Monday, February 17, 2014 11:01 AM
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: 8.1 RBE Documentation
>
>
>
> **
>
> Hi Shawn,
>
> Is this RBE something that is ITSM?  We're on 8.1 and I do not find
> anything looking like RBE.  What is the form name?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Susan
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Pierson, Shawn <
> shawn.pier...@energytransfer.com> wrote:
>
> **
>
> So we've been on 8.1 for a few weeks now (I should post an update to the
> Mid Tier issues thread, it's mostly working for me now.)  We ripped out our
> fully-functional custom email processing code to use the Rules Based Email
> stuff that was added in 8.1.  It seems to work most of the time, but it's
> mostly undocumented and difficult to troubleshoot.
>
>
>
> Is anyone else using this 8.1 functionality and has more thorough
> documentation than BMC provides?  Specifically, I'm looking for information
> on how to troubleshoot the RBE, and what to do when a failure occurs and
> how you can resubmit an email.  For example, I found a failure that was due
> to the email address being incorrect in the People record, so I updated the
> People record and would like to go re-submit the email to process.  On the
> RBE:Message form there's a Status field that you would think you should be
> able to set back to "New" and it would trigger the workflow, but without
> looking at it my guess is that the filters only trigger on submit.
>
>
>
> I'm planning on running some logs so I can try to fix BMC's code, but if
> anyone has any documentation on how things should work, please share it
> with me so I don't end up reinventing the wheel, fire, etc.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> *Shawn Pierson *
>
> Remedy Developer | Energy Transfer
>
>
>
> Private and confidential as detailed 
> here<http://www.energytransfer.com/mail_disclaimer.aspx>.
> If you cannot access hyperlink, please e-mail sender.
>
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>
>
>
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>  Private and confidential as detailed 
> here<http://www.energytransfer.com/mail_disclaimer.aspx>.
> If you cannot access hyperlink, please e-mail sender.
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"

Reply via email to