With version 8.x you can not choose if you want to run Dev Studio in 32 or
64 bit JRE. On a 64-bit client it ask for a 64-bit JRE. If you change to
32-bit after the installation, and Dev Studio want start.


--
J

2014-11-10 19:44 GMT+01:00 Pierson, Shawn <shawn.pier...@energytransfer.com>
:

> **
>
> I’m not the one that did the install so I haven’t investigated them in
> detail, but a few of the issues are:
>
>
>
> 1)      FTS became misconfigured, had to be reconfigured.
>
> 2)      Several formerly 64-bit JRE plugins now require a 32-bit JRE (I
> was skeptical about this but BMC support were the ones that told us that
> most of the plugins can’t run against a 64-bit JRE.)
>
> 3)      Custom approvals are not working correctly, after the approval
> engine not running at all.
>
> 4)      We can’t get rid of the Compatibility View error that sparked
> this thread
>
> 5)      ADDM is unable to write to the CMDB because of Normalization
> Engine errors (even though we don’t have in-line normalization turned on.)
>
> 6)      Other plugin and JRE issues.
>
>
>
> This all happened from the AR System, Mid-Tier, and Atrium Core upgrades.
> I think AR System is the main area all these are an issue in.
> Interestingly, the ITSM upgrade that we did in one of our environments
> introduced no real errors other than conflicting with several of our
> customizations.  My strategy has always been to try to remain as out of the
> box as possible but through some events I don’t want to get into, we’ve
> painted ourselves into a corner around email where we have a massively
> customized RBE as well as outgoing HTML formatted emails.  That’s not BMC’s
> fault though, that’s an internal organizational failure, but the AR System
> issues shouldn’t be happening at all.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> *Shawn Pierson *
>
> Remedy Developer | Energy Transfer
>
>
>
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Jason Miller
> *Sent:* Monday, November 10, 2014 11:17 AM
>
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: ITSM 8.1.2 Mid-Tier Compatibility Mode Defect
>
>
>
> **
>
> What kind of issues are you running into with 8.1.2?
>
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 5:41 AM, Pierson, Shawn <
> shawn.pier...@energytransfer.com> wrote:
>
> **
>
> That’s odd but good that that worked for you because it didn’t for my
> environment.  It may be a moot point though, we’re running into so many
> issues with 8.1.2 that I’m not sure we’re going to go live with any of it
> and just wait for the next release.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> *Shawn Pierson *
>
> Remedy Developer | Energy Transfer
>
>
>
> *From:* Action Request System discussion list(ARSList) [mailto:
> arslist@ARSLIST.ORG] *On Behalf Of *Jason Miller
> *Sent:* Friday, November 07, 2014 6:09 PM
> *To:* arslist@ARSLIST.ORG
> *Subject:* Re: ITSM 8.1.2 Mid-Tier Compatibility Mode Defect
>
>
>
> **
>
> HA!   You know what our standard desktop looks like :)   There are a ton
> of clinical web apps that have much more stringent browser
> requirements/limitations and I really don't want to get involved in that
> mess.  We are a custom shop so our forms are typically much lighter than
> ITSM.  The newer JavaScripting engines past IE8 will be welcomed but IE8 is
> doing ok for use right now.
>
>
>
> Fortunately I found changing *arsystem.compatibility_view* from true to
> false in config.properties and restarting MT did the trick.  I wish there
> was some documentation on this setting so I could see if there is some
> downside to doing this but so far things look good.
>
>
>
> Jason
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 5:03 PM, LJ LongWing <lj.longw...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> **
>
> I haven't investigated this thoroughly, but, I think it would be worth the
> effort to work with your desktop team.  It is my understanding that
> compatibility mode is significantly slower than non, and that is the
> primary reason that the message was instituted.
>
> On Oct 30, 2014 5:44 PM, "Jason Miller" <jason.mil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> **
>
> Hi Shawn,
>
>
>
> Did you get anywhere with this?  We just upgrade our dev and QA to SP2 and
> are now seeing this (annoying) message.  Our browser it highly managed and
> I really don't want to have to include our desktop team in order to update
> to SP2.  I am not going to put SP2 in production without getting rid of
> this message though.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jason
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2014 at 7:11 AM, Pierson, Shawn <
> shawn.pier...@energytransfer.com> wrote:
>
> **
>
> It looks like we found a defect in the combination of ARS and Mid-Tier
> 8.1.2.  It is happening with both IE9 and IE11.
>
>
>
> What happened is that after upgrading the mid-tier, we started seeing this
> warning at the top of the screen:
>
> IE is running in Compatibility View. Please remove Mid-tier URL from
> either IE Compatibility View Settings or Registry location. (ARWARN 9429)
>
>
>
> This is completely useless, because it’s not like the Remedy team or our
> users have any say over whether we run things in compatibility mode or not,
> so we added 9429 to our Suppress-warnings: list in ar.cfg.
>
>
>
> This worked great until we also upgraded the application server.  Now
> either Suppress-warnings doesn’t work or this specific error is impossible
> to disable.  We’re working with BMC support and they’ve been responding
> quickly, but it appears they don’t understand the reason we don’t want that
> error on the top of every single screen.  Unfortunately, if we can’t find a
> way to disable this, we’re going to be unable to upgrade.  Hopefully BMC
> recognizes the error of their ways and releases a hotfix soon.
>
>
>
> Do any of you have any ideas of how to suppress that message in the
> meantime?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> *Shawn Pierson *
>
> Remedy Developer | Energy Transfer
>
>
>
> Private and confidential as detailed here
> <http://www.energytransfer.com/mail_disclaimer.aspx>. If you cannot
> access hyperlink, please e-mail sender.
>
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>
>
>
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>
>
>
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>
> Private and confidential as detailed here
> <http://www.energytransfer.com/mail_disclaimer.aspx>. If you cannot
> access hyperlink, please e-mail sender.
>
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>
>
>
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>  Private and confidential as detailed here
> <http://www.energytransfer.com/mail_disclaimer.aspx>. If you cannot
> access hyperlink, please e-mail sender.
> _ARSlist: "Where the Answers Are" and have been for 20 years_
>

_______________________________________________________________________________
UNSUBSCRIBE or access ARSlist Archives at www.arslist.org
"Where the Answers Are, and have been for 20 years"

Reply via email to