You have to use what's available or else do your own census or study.
The other choice is to do neither and have absolutely no idea what's
going on. Come on you want to try and adjust the stats and come up
with a range - then go ahead. The exercise is still valid and
important.
-----Original Message-----
From: bluebishop82 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, 12 May 2005 02:07:34 -0000
Subject: [AsburyPark] Re: The Case of the Missing Voters
Good point, JJ. But do we have to use bad stats just because they
do?
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "jerseyjohn99"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can you use "bad stats" to justify Abbott district membership or
> Extraordinary Aid from the state for the 4th year in a row?
>
> What are the "real stats" and what would the city's demographics
look
> like using these real stats compared to the other 30 Abbott
districts?
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "bluebishop82"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > "Official" stats that are outdated are as useless
as "unofficial"
> > stats. You were here in 2000 - those states are off,
particularly
> > property values and income levels. You also can't use bad stats
and
> > the excuse that its ok because you don't have access to the
right
> > ones.
> >
> >
Yahoo! Groups Links
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
