"…infallibility… Folks …are certainly free to support the incumbents
and ask for prettier lights without having done something
[inconsistent]."
Ah ha, we revisit `…suck and blow'; see it's not that you can't
`support & ask', it is that you can not do both at the same time.
Even the infallible would find violating rules of physics, and wanting
to do so, just ain't the same as being able to do so.
If you can't stand the `heat in the kitchen' you've created (by
reelecting these incompetents), don't ask why, who, how or when can we
`now' change the mind set of those who believe a plurality based on 5
– 9% of registered voters equals a landslide mandate. Waste not your
script here, send your request to the attention of Sanders, Bruno &
Loffredo; when that doesn't work think about joining us.
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "bluebishop82" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I don't recall anyone claiming that their support was based upon
> infallibility, unless you are talking about the papal election.
>
> Folks like Allan Peterson are certainly free to support the incumbents
> and ask for prettier lights without having done something inconsistant.
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > For any who voiced support for the incumbents on this forum, you got
> > what you wished for. Their re-election is almost too hard to bear
> for
> > many of us. Please don't insult to injury by complaining about some
> > aspect of the redevelopment or you will be greeted by a chorus
> of "we
> > told you so."
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
