--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "bluebishop82" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Oh my. You mean she made a clerical error? She attached the wrong > pages? She confused the two? etc
But she is not getting up and lying or have someone else lie. Your comparison is ridiculous. It was a shame to someone with the reputation of John Clarke to get up and cover for them. Even Loffredo is not satified by the answers although he is simply concerned about how the wrong plan got submitted. Reagan would have been proud at Clarke's "I can't recalls" > > I feel bad for her. Some people are going to read this all wrong. > They are going to say that there is a reason she did it. Perhaps a > conspiracy. Perhaps something deliberate. Perhaps intentionally > misleading! They will accuse her of not having the people of Asbury > Park's interest at heart. They will accuse her of loyalty to the > developer! > > Some will claim she is trying to deceive a government agency. Some > will say it is perhaps criminal and call the Prosecutor! A > councilman may move for a vote of "no confidence" in her. Still > others will claim gross incompetence or negligence. They will go > the council meeting and demand that she be fired from her job! > > What they won't do is say she made an oversight that caused no > harm. They can't say that, because the don't believe in occam's > razor. > > I of course can say it. She made a simple, harmless mistake. So > what. In the word's of Bill Clinton, can we just move on? > > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "bluebishop82" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > On Asburyradio.com, Maureen links to a page from the March > proposal > > and > > > a page from the June proposal, and says the wording is different > > > regarding C8 (referred to as 300 Ocean Mile on the pages). > > > > > > I don't see where the wording is different between the two. Can > > anyone > > > else? Maureen? > > > > > Maureen put up the wrong pages. That shows page 79 from both the > March > > and June plan. They are identical in that they require the > developer > > to FINISH the project to build to the existing height. The > comparison > > should be between page 77, that is the Dwelling Unit ditribution > chart > > that has the added language about demolishing c-8 in the June > version. > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get fast access to your favorite Yahoo! Groups. Make Yahoo! your home page http://us.click.yahoo.com/dpRU5A/wUILAA/yQLSAA/Y2tolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
