--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "bluebishop82" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Sharon Boone"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Just commenting:
> > Blue Bishop said: "Liberals gave us Kelo, and now their pinko-
> >commie
> > disrespect for private property rights continue at a local level
> >with this decision". So, Bishop, just what did you mean in this
> >statement?
>
>
> The Supreme Court decision in the Kelo case last year that said the
> Constitution allows for private developers to take your home was
> drafted by and joined by all the liberal Justices. The
> conservatives (Thomas, Scalia, Rhenquist) were all against it.
>
> This is no surprise to conservatives, as liberal policy has always
> shown a disrespect for private property. The whole idea of being
> a "conservative" is to "conserve" for the people that which is
> theirs. That's where the name comes from. Conservatism is a
people
> driven philosopy, not a government driven philosphy, which is why I
> subscribe to it.
>
>
> > 1. What's wrong with being a Liberal?
>
> Liberals want government control of your property. Conservatives
> want you to control your own property.
>
>
> > 2. Who YOU calling a pinko-commie?
>
> Anyone who does not respect private property rights.
>
> > 3. What IS a pinko-commie, Mr. Atty. at Law?
> > Is that like being a little-pregnant? Black? Gay?
>
> The very basis for communism was that the government owned and
> controlled all the property - poeple owned none of it. It is the
> primary holding in the Communist Manifesto. Capitalism is the
> opposite - people have the right to accumulate capital (which is
> property).
>
> When I see liberals and conservatives, I see the debate over
respect
> for people's private property. The Kelo decision, for the first
> time in a long time, showed that this is no academic or
hypothetical
> debate. It affects lives greatly. The entire American ideal of
> freedom to control one's property was at stake in Kelo, and the
> liberal justices moved us more toward the communist ideal of
> government control of property. Pinko-commies.
>
> > 4. Why the Label, or the name-calling?
>
> If liberals don't want me calling them commies, they shouldn't act
> like commies as with the Kelo decision.
>
> > 5. Do you equate ALL Democrats as being pinko-commies, liberals?
>
> No, not all. As I've said before, 99% of all democrats give the
> rest of the democrats a bad name.
>
> > My take is that for being Liberal, meaning, FREE instead of
> > encumbered and restricted, I have to put up with a "strict
> > constructionist"? Code language for Southerners who crossed-over
> >to Republican, at the year 1964-65 for the Civil Rights Act,
giving
> >ME the Right to Vote and the right to sit in the front seat of the
> >bus?
>
> I don't know why liberal means "free" to you when it means the
> government can take your property. Obviously conservative means
free
> because the whole idea of it is keeping government small and out of
> people's lives. That's free.
>
> A "strict constructionist" is someone that looks at the 5th
> Amendment where it says government can only take your land
> for "public use" and "strictly construes" the words - "use" means
> they have to "use" your property after they take it (train station,
> post office, etc.). A "loose constructionist" sees "public use"
> and "loosely construes" the word "use" as also meaning "good."
> Since the government declares that the developer is more "good"
than
> you, they can take your house and give it to the developer,
> because "use" now means "good."
>
> I believe laws should be interpreted using the words that are in
> there. I'm a strict constructionist, and anyone who believes in
> Democracy (people write the laws, not the courts) is a strict
> constructionist too. More appropriately I'm an originalist, but
that
> is another topic.
>
> As for the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Democrats filibustered the
> law. Republicans broke the filibuster. When the vote came, more
> Republicans voted "Yes" for it than Democrats did. If you believe
> your right to Vote and sit in the front of a bus is owed to the
> Civil Rights Act of 1964, than you owe thanks to the Republicans
who
> were responsible for passing it.
>
> > Aren't you the guy that said "racism doesn't exist in AP"? Just
> > checking. Watch out for FLAMES!
>
> I still maintain there is no racism problem in Asbury. There is a
> problem with racists outside of here looking in at us, but no
> problem among our people.
>
No, I DON'T Thank the Republicans or anyone, since I was already an
American Citizen, encumbered by "JIM CROW". The Constitution WASN't
being enforced! As usual, you've MIS-intrepreted what I've said to
suit YOU! Conserve means to "hold back"! Liberal, means EVERYONE has
a chance. You, however are intrepreting conservatism as liberalism.
While this conservative government, run by your President is "spying"
on its' citizens is likened to Communism, where the people were ruled
by a restrictive government, that told kids to "tell on" their
parents, friends, relatives and ANYONE THEY thought was a dissident,
THIS government is fast becoming a government RULED by a few, rather
than the MASSES! Your President received over $200K from Abramoff,
yet he claims to NOT know him! HAH! When Pigs Fly! Everyday these
liars CHANGE their story, while trampling on the rights of others!
being a liberal means "exposing" the corruption in this government,
in this city, if it exists and anywhere a so-called democracy is
supposed to exist! Liberal? I'll stay one, thank you! As far as
Republicans go, NONE of the so-called Republicans in the House or
Senate today, voted in FAVOR of Civil-Rights! Isn't that why Kennedy
was assassinated? One of the reasons? Republicans are breaking the
law everyday with this lobbyists scandal! I hope they ALL go to jail,
be impeached or whatever it takes to uphold the "rule of law"!
Immeninant domain should be the PEOPLE KEEPING their land, not having
it forcibly taken by developers who are money-grabbing THIEVES!
Those "shacks" passing for town-houses are disgraceful!
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
