--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "bluebishop82" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> As I understand conflicts of interests, typically it arises for an
> attorney when:
>
> 1. He finds himself in a position of duty toward someone whose
> interests are contrary to the interests of client's in the case; or
>
> 2. He is suing a prior client.
>
>
> If an attorney represents the City in an eminant domain proceeding
> against homeowner, and the attorney also represented the
developer, it
> appears to me the City and developer have the same interest (they
both
> want the homeowner out), and he is not suing a prior client.
>
> Wby does anyone think there is a "conflict" of "interests" here?
>
It is a little too close for comfort. What about the deal to have
the developer appointed and using the City's power of eminent domain
for that developer? I guess that is what Fred was referring to when
he said Aaron was not LB's redevelopment attorney.
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
