Aren't there "attractive nuisance" laws about how property must be
maintained when children could be involved?
>From an on-line legal site, (note that construction sites are
specifically mentioned): "An attractive nuisance is a potentially
harmful object so inviting or interesting to a child that it would
lure the child onto the property to investigate. An unenclosed
swimming pool is the classic example, for instance and...children
are also fascinated by construction sites and equipment"
Perhaps the town or Asbury Partners are creating too much legal
liability for themselves by not cleaning up all the messes...
--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "dfsavgny" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "Hinge" <hinge98@> wrote:
> >
> > Is that why we have that ugly pile of rubble sitting across
from the
> Stone Pony for the past
> > few years?
>
> To make matters worse, that is not even the property of Asbury
> Partners. The block front between 2 and 3rd aves are 2 lots owned
by
> different parts of the Michaels family. Their property is slated
for
> condemnation. I know at one point several months ago the pile was
put
> on their property without authorization by the owners. I don;t
know if
> some deal has been struck since then. That is not Partners per se,
but
> I beleive their contractors doing the infrastructure.
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
