We are all allowed to our opinions. She may or may not answer. My guess she did not receive an answer to her post on here from the Asbury Park Press. In fact it I found it very unprofessional. Since both are "reporting" Asbury news I think you should rely on what is done well instead of taking shots. Also I doubt Nancy from the press reads this board so it was a cheap shot. And you wonder why I am bias?
----- Original Message ---- From: dfsavgny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, December 4, 2006 11:48:31 AM Subject: [AsburyPark] Re: In case asbury radio did not see --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, Allan Peterson <nnjallans1@ ...> wrote: > > I posted this message and it may have been missed. > > I saw that Maureen questioned the Madison Marquette story in the press. I too have a question about one of her stories that was focused on how the police handled their investigation. I also noticed that the "Note" part was signed "City Historian". Do we have a City Historian again? I suspect that she will answer you when she gets ready to. But why she would even answer someone who is so obviously biased against her, called her radiohead, etc., is beyond me. A pure waste of time. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Music Unlimited Access over 1 million songs. http://music.yahoo.com/unlimited
