--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "asburyparkpedaler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You should reread his post he said Bruno was intimadated. If you had done your homework it wasn't Bruno who demanded the enforcement of that ordinance.
It was July, and I know it was intimidation in his own words; beleive > it or not, underneath all of my rhetoric, I know what I'm talking > about. But if it was football players that intimidated him, why did > he immediately go after bicycles, gioing so far as to implement 24 > hr "emergency" enforcement. It makes even less sense now, unless he's > trying to deny implementing said rules. Furthermore, if your still in > denial, I don't know what to tell you. Honestly, I don't need to > spend all my time and energy in a frivolous attempt at proving > corruption against the city. It's obvious to anyone willing to open > their eyes. That's for you guys whose hearts are still here. I am on > this and other forums to warn others about the false reporting in > media about this place, and offer some of the truth about what it > really is to live here. Yes, I still live here, and know what goes on > daily. Bravo on being bruno's freind, must not be easy from what I've > seen. > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "apoojo" <apoojo@> wrote: > > > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "asburyparkpedaler" <robert@> > > wrote: > > > > > i did what you suggested i called him and asked him, he said it was > a > > an august night, a majority of the lights on the bdwalk were out, > and > > 8 to 10 kids were playing football on the bdwalk, almost knocking > > over an enderly man in a wheel chair, not bruno, and he indeed did > > use the word intimidated, to that issue not bikes... again as far > as > > corruption to say you reported it to the city, but they do not > care, > > did you ever hear of the words county prosecutor, or better yet > > CHRISTIE? > > > > > > > I have reported it (corruption), only it's to the city. They are > > > obviously not interested in what I have to say. If someone wanted > > to > > > collect my info in a forum where it would be properly addressed > and > > > processed, I'd offer it up; but I haven't found anyone yet > > interested > > > in the truth. I can prove what I say, but it's not the bombshell > > type > > > of corruption, like someone lining their pockets with taxpayers > > money > > > kind of stuff; just how people use their public positions to > > > selectively enforce laws,and intimidate merchants/citizens. Is > > there > > > pockets being lined in the process? Almost certainly. But, > > everything > > > in Asbury is hearsay, isn't it? That's the problem. Furthermore, > we > > > can respectfully agree to disagree. I know that I saw Jim Keady > on > > at > > > least two occasions on BB boards on his bike, while their > ordinance > > > was in effect. Also, from the time I arrived to set up my > business > > in > > > march of '05, I spent more time on that boardwalk than ANYONE for > > > over the next year; and I mean every day. So what I report about > > > councilmen is just what I experienced in that time frame. > Although > > > Keady was up there for more than the just the news stories. And > on > > at > > > least two occasions Brunbo was too; one of these was the > > intimidation > > > episode. And when I call it intimidation, I'm using his own > words, > > > ask him. > > > > > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "apoojo" <apoojo@> wrote: > > > > > > > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "asburyparkpedaler" > <robert@> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > i have no reason, not to believe some of your posts,im sorry > what > > > > happened to you did and wish you luck,however i disagree with > > > several > > > > of your statements, knowing j. bruno for many years i have > never > > > > known him to be intiminated, by anything let alone kids on > bikes, > > i > > > > also disagree with your statement that he is only on the bd > walk > > > for > > > > photops, that is totally untrue. i also dont believe councilman > > > keady > > > > would knowingly break the law as you stated. i also believe > that > > if > > > > you know of corruption going on in this city , you said it you > > are > > > > wrong not to report it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am the pedaler. Realize first, that I have no reason to lie > > on > > > my > > > > > web page. I put down the facts the way that I see them. I > came > > > here > > > > > with the very best of intentions of starting and keeping my > > > > business > > > > > here. I don't know where the demand originated; just that the > > > > police > > > > > were the ones sent down to inform me. Terry Reidy had told me > > of > > > > the > > > > > bike lane coming very soon, and I had the word (with plenty > of > > > > > witnesses) of Mark Kinmon and Amir Berkovitz that my rentals > > > would > > > > > not have a problem on the boards. I even told them that the > > > reason > > > > I > > > > > needed to know was that I was looking to invest in an entire > > new > > > > > fleet of bikes. So, on their word (obviously unofficial in > AP), > > I > > > > > spent $14,000.00 for that new fleet. Jim Bruno was the one > > > > > intimidated by gang of youths, with lights out, on "his > > > boardwalk" > > > > > (which he hasn't been on since); and vowed never to feel that > > way > > > > > again. Furthermore, if the Partners had no knowledge of the > > > > impending > > > > > troubles with the city, why did they specifically put a rider > > in > > > my > > > > > (illegal) lease for the '06 season. I don't blame them for > > that, > > > > > after all, they already had the knowledge that the city has > the > > > > > potential to spite itself. But, In went on the word of city > > > > officials > > > > > at the highest levels; only to be screwed, and then > ostracized. > > > And > > > > > anyone up there can attest to the lack of security on both > > ends. > > > > > Don't get me wrong, the police were very good with response, > > once > > > > > they were called. The partners security was however, > > particularly > > > > > in '06, useless. Furthermore, I realize, as should you, that > > > those > > > > > defending the city and partners have their self serving > reasons > > > to > > > > do > > > > > so; but are by no means representative of the truth. I offer > > > proof > > > > > for my words. There are plenty of records, documentation, > > photos, > > > > and > > > > > videos, not to mention the current status of the city, to > prove > > > > what > > > > > I say is the truth. If you've read my web page, that only > > > scratches > > > > > the surface of my gripes; I've gone easy on the partners > there, > > > and > > > > > put the blame, deservedly so, on the City. But believe you > me, > > > the > > > > > partners are incompetent and, in fact, evil in their own > right. > > > But > > > > > you don't need me to tell you that. I am eager to partake in > > this > > > > and > > > > > other discussions; so you don't need to speculate about my > > > > position. > > > > > I will offer it honestly, as I see it. Robert > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Allan Peterson > <nnjallans1@> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > I wonder who made the demand. I think the city holds more > > > > > responsibility in this. Partners brought a business to the > > > > > boardwalk. If the city demamded him to close that is not the > > > > > responsibility of partners. The counsilman should not be > > annoyed > > > > > that there is a bike shop on the boradwalk but the real > > question > > > is > > > > > why is there so little pollice / security on the boardwalk. > I > > do > > > > not > > > > > know what partners has to provide but the city should have > > police > > > > in > > > > > addition. I see it as the city driving away a business. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > > > > > From: dfsavgny <dfsavgny@> > > > > > > To: AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com > > > > > > Sent: Monday, February 19, 2007 10:24:54 PM > > > > > > Subject: [AsburyPark] Re: Asbury Park Bike Pedaler - Worth > > > Quoting > > > > > > > > > > > > --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com, Allan Peterson > > > > > <nnjallans1@ ...> > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Who made this demand? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Are you hoping it's JK? Iknow he tried to get abike lane > but > > it > > > > was > > > > > > shot down. > > > > > > > > > > > > Does no one see the bigger picture here? itis bigger than > > bikes > > > > on > > > > > the > > > > > > bw. It is the failure of the bw. Did I read that Gertrude > > Hawk > > > > > won't be > > > > > > back either? Lights out on the bw. Lights out on Grand > across > > > > from > > > > > > Library Square I don't know how long? JCP&L. That's the > > answer. > > > I > > > > > heard > > > > > > that from the dais at a council meeting. How bout this is > > your > > > > city > > > > > > that you have been elected to run? How about the buck stops > > > here? > > > > > > Always ready for photo ops and faux landings. Is the > > > > redevelopment > > > > > just > > > > > > hype? It is or it isn't. Prove its not. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > > > ______________ > > > > > > Any questions? Get answers on any topic at > > > > www.Answers.yahoo.com. > > > > > Try it now. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> See what's inside the new Yahoo! Groups email. http://us.click.yahoo.com/0It09A/bOaOAA/yQLSAA/Y2tolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/