Board says 40-bed project is too big for city
Posted by the Asbury Park Press on 10/17/07
ASBURY PARK — The Zoning Board of Adjustment Tuesday night voted to close  
down a 40-bed homeless shelter, saying it is too big for a city of 17,000 and  
that the rescue mission could cycle up to 1,000 homeless men a year from all  
over the state through the shelter with no program to help them. 
The zoners unanimously rejected the Jersey Shore Rescue Mission's plans in  
their entirety — 37 beds at night, a soup kitchen, a retail car sales and a  
house of worship on Memorial Drive near Asbury Avenue. The mission needed  
variances from the board to operate in a light industrial zone. 
Most of the seven board members who voted have been silent through months of  
hearings but all agreed that plans by David Scott, director of the Market 
Street  Mission in Morristown, to expand his operations on a grand scale for 
Asbury Park  is detrimental to a city with an average of 25 homeless people 
which 
the city  can take care of. 
"The size of your operation is too big for what we need," said member Pamela  
Lamberton. 
She said the program's counselors are inadequate and to approve the mission's 
 application would require placing so many conditions on the approval that it 
 would redesign the program. 
"And that is not my job," Lamberton said. 
"Homelessness is the direct result of a larger problem — the economy and  
jobs," said board co-Chairman Russell Lewis. "I want this building to be used  
for jobs. 
"I see this mission creating a large number of people going out in the  
street, untrained, looking for work, and we don't have the work to give them,"  
Lewis said. 
Since February, the board has heard testimony each month to weigh the  
shelter's inherently beneficial use against the detrimental effect to the  
city. 
The case started two-and-a-half years ago when the board heard testimony and  
rejected the shelter. The mission appealed to then-Superior Court Judge  
Alexander Lehrer, who ruled the board did not consider that the mission is an  
inherently beneficial use. 
The board then approved the mission with a number of conditions. A group of  
residents learned about that approval last year, formed Stand Up For Asbury, 
and  filed a lawsuit. Lehrer sent the matter back to the zoners to weigh the  
beneficial use versus the detrimental effect. 
Brendan Judge, attorney for the mission, said his client will appeal the  
zoners' decision. 
Ronald S. Gasiorowski, representing the objectors, said he's confident the  
court will rule in the group's favor. He said he'll seek to have the facility,  
which had opened in recent months, closed. 
Of the 40 beds at the shelter, 27 are for men who can stay up to 10 days but  
must leave the facility during the day. Ten beds are for men who go into the  
mission's alcohol and drug recovery program which can run from six to nine  
months. Three beds are for staff. 
"We don't need to be a regional center for the homeless," said the Rev. David 
 Parreott, a board member. 
"It's really not fair to keep dumping on Asbury Park," said board Chairman  
Keith Zyla. 
Zyla said the mission did not give him enough information on "what happens to 
 27 people turned out to the street every day." He said the mission affects 
both  the quality of life in the nearby neighborhoods and the city's police and 
social  workers. 
He said Asbury Park has a tremendous amount of social and religious  
organizations categorized as beneficial uses. 
"Why are Spring Lake, Rumson and Deal not doing their fair share?" Zyla  
asked. "Why are these people (Jersey Shore Rescue Mission) not going to other  
municipalities and saying "Why aren't you putting these in your town?' Why are  
you not going to other cities and telling those cities they need to help? Look  
at these other municipalities surrounding this city. They're so wealthy . . . 
 ." 
Board members Dave Williams, Carol Jones and Lorraine Jones expressed similar 
 concerns as their colleagues in voting to deny the operation of the shelter. 
Most of the support for the mission appeared to be people who minister to the 
 poor and the homeless, or whose religious beliefs are strongly rooted in 
helping  the poor. 
But the zoning board heard testimony from city officials and residents of an  
Asbury Park that has grown stronger with a new middle class demanding that 
the  city approve appropriate programs and no longer be treated any different 
than  its neighbors. 
_Click  here: APP.COM - Asbury Park zoners vote to close homeless shelter | 
Asbury Park  Press Online_ 
(http://www.app.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071017/NEWS01/710170400/1004)  
 
 



************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com

Reply via email to