--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "rogersduncan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> You could be right, because I am not an attorney.
>
> It would require an ex parte' Order!
Ex parte means "for one party," and refers to motions, hearings or
orders granted on the request of and for the benefit of one party only.
That is an exception to the basic rule that both parties must be
present at any argument before a judge, and to the rule that an
attorney may not notify a judge without previously notifying the
opposition.
Ex parte matters are usually temporary orders (like a restraining
order or temporary custody) pending a formal hearing or an emergency
request for a continuance.
Most jurisdictions require at least a diligent attempt to contact the
other party's lawyer of the time and place of any ex parte hearing.
>
> What I find interesting, is that the mission appealed originally in
> chancellry (sp) where Lehre presided. How come yesterday's decision
> was made in Lawson's Law Division. Do you know the reason for that?
> RD
No, and I do not care. All I care is that JSRM was shut down and I
hope we keep it that way.
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
