"no." On Dec 27, 2007, at 12:30 PM, justifiedright wrote:
John you keep posting messages about me personally. Something wrong you want to talk to about, friend? --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Jersey Shore John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I suppose one could filter all of your views of republicanism through > this last message. > > On Dec 27, 2007, at 11:25 AM, justifiedright wrote: > > > no > > > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Jersey Shore John > > <jerseyshorejohn@> wrote: > > > > > > he can be both. ever heard of a republican who worships money > > before? > > > > > > On Dec 27, 2007, at 11:01 AM, justifiedright wrote: > > > > > > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Jersey Shore John > > > > <jerseyshorejohn@> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > "Transatlantic Murdoch watchers can tell you that all this is > > > > >wishful > > > > > thinking even without the demonic TV skills of Fox's supremo > > >Roger > > > > > Ailes. Less publicized than Murdoch's fierce political > > > > >conservatism > > > > > -- undoubtedly his private conviction -- is his readiness to > > turn > > > > >on > > > > > a dime when it's commercially expedient. That suppleness is > > one >of > > > > > the things that make him such a formidable opponent. Nothing > > > > > distracts him from his business goals -- not ideology, not > > > > > friendship, not some inconvenient promise, not even family." > > > > > > > > John this is not a criticism of you but rather the person who > > penned > > > > the above paragraph. > > > > > > > > In the SAME SENTENCE I'm told of Murdock's "fierce political > > > > conservatism" I'm also told of his "readiness to turn on a > > dime." Er, > > > > which is it then? > > > > > > > > A Free Press means you we have to suffer fools such as this > > writer. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
