--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Green Acres = waste of valuable space.
>
> maybe it is but once its designated isnt it next to impossible to
remove it, im not a lawyer and know you are so will let you check it
out, i thought the regs were something like for every 3 units you
removed you had to replace with 5 units, and they had to be of the
same category, if you removed 3 beachfront units you have to replace
it with beachfront units, you could not trade off land at a less
value, not sure been a long time since i read the regs, who ever made
them green acres to begin with Lloyd Mcbride and the kidde rides were
not operating on green acres space when Carabretta gave him the boot
in the 80's was he?
> >
> > Tommy -
> > Were you at the Planning Board meeting?
> > If you had been there, you would know that MM was making a point
> that
> > they can't get involved in building permanent bathrooms and still
> > make their Memorial Day deadline. That's why their solution is
pop
> > out bathrooms as part of the pop out kiosks on the green acres
> > spaces. This has zero connection to libs, Tom, and I think you
> know
> > it.
> > Maureen
> >
> > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "justifiedright"
> > <justifiedright@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Let MM rip out the bathrooms and build permenant
> > > bathrooms/lockers/showers on the green acres space.
> > >
> > > Green Acres at the beach are nothing but a useless waste of
> space.
> > > But that's what you get with a City full of libs who love the
> > > government to regulate everything - problems for the business
> that
> > > will bring it back.
> > >
> > > Reap what you sow.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, "radio881gal"
<restore881FM@>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Madison Marquette and Asbury Partners, as part of its limited
> > > > liability company, showed their plans to the planning board
> > Monday
> > > > night for renovating the boardwalk pavilions from 1st to 5th
> > > Avenues.
> > > > The plan is for retail space to be completed by Memorial Day.
> > > That's
> > > > just fine except the plans also call for ripping out the
> sewers
> > > lines
> > > > that are already in the pavilions. The city should refuse to
> > grant
> > > > any permits for removing bathrooms in the pavilions.
> > > > MM's argument is that retailers don't want the hassles
that
> > > > accompany the traffic that passes by their shops enroute to
> the
> > > > public restrooms. However Planning Board members didn't buy
> it,
> > > > saying it was obvious that the design was trying to maximize
> the
> > > > retail space.
> > > > In conceding to protests about eliminating bathrooms, the
> > > > architect and reps from MM, including John Lanham, first
> offered
> > > to
> > > > include bathrooms in the Second Avenue pavilion if Green
Acres
> > > (CAFRA
> > > > the coastal landuse department of the State Dept. of
> > Environmental
> > > > Protection has already given its approval) refuses their
> request
> > > to
> > > > put public bathrooms as part of pop up retail kiosks on the
> Green
> > > > Acres properties between the pavilions. (What an
environmental
> > > insult
> > > > this is - putting toilets on Green Acres?) By the way, the
pop
> up
> > > > alternatives won't be there year round, because they wouldn't
> be
> > > > heated.
> > > > Finally, it appeared that MM had vowed to keep the public
> > > > restrooms in the Second Ave pavilion, regardless of the Green
> > > Acres
> > > > reaction to its plan. This is quite a concession considering
> that
> > > the
> > > > public swim club - which has to be built before a public swim
> > club
> > > > can be erected - is going to be placed in the Second Ave.
> > > > pavilion.
> > > > The public club plans call for a pool 18" deep,
> with "fluffy
> > > > pillows" scattered about, in addition to about 50 lounges,
and
> > > > attendants walking among clubbers, who will pay $5 a day,
> > > spritzing
> > > > them with "lavender water" and handing out "fluffy white
> towels".
> > > A
> > > > scene out of a W Hotel ad, no?
> > > > Seriously folks, here's another cheap trade off under the
> > > > rationale of rushing to meet a deadline. Sewer lines, as
every
> > > > homeowner or property owner knows, are a huge investment. Why
> > > would
> > > > we would we rip them out? And temporary toilets send a huge
> > > negative
> > > > message to visitors wondering if Asbury's rebirth is
> > > permanent. "Yeah
> > > > lady, it's as permanent as that toilet seat there."
> > > > The council doesn't want to see the bathrooms go. Most of
> the
> > > > planning board didn't buy it. But they need to know how
> residents
> > > > feel, too, to give them more ammo in fighting this one. So
> please
> > > > send an email, pick up the phone - open the window and
> SCREAM!!!
> > > > Maureen
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
