I don't think it's wrong to be critical of the way the system was implemented. This is a system, which people have shown quite a bit of confusion in using - one that had at least one local town (Belmar) eliminate the system for that very reason. The meters also run a good 5 hours longer than any of the nearby towns.
I think those two points are definitely worth discussing and debating. dfsavgny wrote: > > --- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com > <mailto:AsburyPark%40yahoogroups.com>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > True I don't get that. The city buys these units and then MM opens > free lots. The city should explain to us tax payers > > The lots will not be free but MM cannot charge to park there until > they recieve COs. The city asked MM to open them up free in the > interim to help the parking situation. Some of you are too critical > even when the city tries to do something good. Damend ifyou do and > damned if you don't. The parking meters are good for this city. The > implementation was not perfect. People hate change. They will learn to > use the system. Parking is never free. There is always a cost. Time > for people to grow up. Its not your uncle's AP anymore. > > ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
