--- In AsburyPark@yahoogroups.com, Teddysea@... wrote:
>
> Well, i'm feeling reckless today so let's throw out some ideas.  Since  
> iStar owns the property but not the development rights then why don't we 
> restart  our redevelopment.  Why not find those old plans in City Hall that I 
> keep 
>  talking about and dust them off.  It actually would be a very workable 
> plan  today.  A combination of residential and commercial and if I remember  
> correctly no where near 3000 units.  It was also designed so that  individual 
> builders could bid on each section which had specific guidelines as  to 
> number of residential units, square footage of commerical and minimum dollars 
>  
> to be spent.
>  
> Now, here's the brilliant part--once we have a redevelopment back in place, 
>  why can't we simply take back the iStar properties by eminent domain, 
> based on  current market value?  Crazier things have been done on this 
> beachfront  (like my property taken when there wasn't even a plan to develop 
> the  
> site).  And, hopefully any City property owned by Asbury Properties had  
> reverter clauses (dare we hope that was done).
>  
> just my 2 cents worth...
> 

Lets expand on those thoughts. iStar owns SOME of the property outright, but 
currently has the right to acquire additional property through eminent domain.

Lets assume that the redevelopment contract can be voided due to default which 
would leave the redevelopment plan intact. The plan could then be amended to 
change which properties are to be acquired along with zoning, land use, 
densities, etc.

The prior plan (which I have a copy of) is certainly a better model than what 
we have now. Unfortunately the Wesley Grove project is already there which 
would need to be worked around. In any case a new plan is an absolute 
necessity, lets talk about that later. Planing will be critical to get out of 
this mess.

The City could itself exercise eminent domain for the traditional purposes such 
as parks, streets, public amenities... The current foundation of the C8 site is 
a parking garage which would qualify as a public amenity - eminent domain it 
and then sell the air rights above it for private development. Public/private 
partnership without the ridiculous land banking and third parties.

Implement that concept in strategic locations along with independent 
development according to the new plan. Force istar to develop its parcel or 
face condemnation such as the Empress scenario.

Werner




------------------------------------

Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AsburyPark/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    asburypark-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    asburypark-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    asburypark-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to