Robert Goldman writes: > [As an aside, I'm intrigued that you are using RT --- we gave up on it > eventually because it's state is all global, so that we were never > comfortable that stuff we set up to test in one system would not clash > with tests in other systems....]
For my needs so far, I always grabbed rt.lisp, slurped it into my project tree, and built a domain-specific testing infrastructure on top of it. (Of course, I adapted the package of the rt code each time, so there's no problem with one shared global RT state.) As long as you're dealing with readably-printable data structures, RT is just fine -- and it's so minimal that you can just include it and do not have to add a dependency to your project. -T. _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list asdf-devel@common-lisp.net http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
