On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Robert Goldman <[email protected]> wrote:
> So may we expect that the bytecodes compiler will NEVER be active out of > the box? I.e., all we need to do is turn ON the bytecode compiler when > we want it, not make sure it's off when we don't (for the purposes of > testing)? > No, what I meant is that you have to make sure whether the version contains a bytecompiler (it is about 5 or 6 months old), and whether it was built at all (there are ways to suppress components from ECL during configuration) Unfortunately, I am lost in the mire of RUN-SHELL-COMMAND, and it'll be > a while before I can get to this (git can have multiple branches --- me, > not so much!). > No problem. If I find time I will try to add the options for ECL. Juanjo -- Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain) http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com
_______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
