On 9/20/11 Sep 20 -9:10 AM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Robert Goldman <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > So may we expect that the bytecodes compiler will NEVER be active out of > the box? I.e., all we need to do is turn ON the bytecode compiler when > we want it, not make sure it's off when we don't (for the purposes of > testing)? > > > No, what I meant is that you have to make sure whether the version > contains a bytecompiler (it is about 5 or 6 months old), and whether it > was built at all (there are ways to suppress components from ECL during > configuration) > > Unfortunately, I am lost in the mire of RUN-SHELL-COMMAND, and it'll be > a while before I can get to this (git can have multiple branches --- me, > not so much!). > > > No problem. If I find time I will try to add the options for ECL.
If you find time, will you please look into tests/run-tests.sh? And also tests/compile-asdf.lisp? That's where the tests start up. I am thinking we might modify the tests so that it accepts both ecl and ecl-bytecompiler as lisp implementation names. thanks, r _______________________________________________ asdf-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/asdf-devel
