I prefer dev over main, since it’s more clear about the purpose of the branch. Main is just not a very descriptive word. For one thing, for most people, stable will actually be the “main” branch.
This isn’t a strong preference, but honestly I doubt anyone has that strong of feelings on the subject. best, phoebe > On Jul 12, 2021, at 9:59 AM, Robert Goldman <rpgold...@sift.info> wrote: > > As we move forward, and try to add some new facilities to ASDF, this seems > like a good time to revise the branching structure that we use. > > In particular, I would like to add a stable branch that will permit > continuation of the 3.3 release series, the need for which is illustrated by > Mark E's recent merge request. > > If we are going to make that change, it seems like a good time to rename the > master branch to either main or dev. Any preferences? > > I'd like to have a quick discussion about this over the week, with an eye to > getting a solution in place by Friday. > > Thanks for your thoughts, > > R >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
