I think we should add this link, as well as a link to the original README in git (which I suppose subsumes the original defsystem proposal link in the archived email) somewhere in doc/index.html.
Looking at said doc/index.html, I see that a lot of references to historical ASDF alternatives were commented out—why not keep them, if only in a separate paragraph or section? Or move them somewhere deep in the manual? I believe they have historical value, too. —♯ƒ • François-René ÐVB Rideau •Reflection&Cybernethics• http://fare.tunes.org “Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do it from religious conviction.” ― Blaise Pascal (1623–1662) On Thu, Feb 1, 2024 at 9:34 AM cage <cage-...@twistfold.it> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 10:38:29AM +0100, Rudolf Schlatte wrote: > > Hi! > > [...] > > > If you need a definitive answer, you could ask Dan Barlow, he's on the > > fediverse at @d...@brvt.telent.net > > The funny thing is that I realized that the person I talked with on > the fediverse in the last days, is Him! 😅 > > He provided a link that I pasted below because I think is very > interesting for an historical perspective of ASDF development. > > https://sourceforge.net/p/cclan/mailman/message/2011712/ > > Bye! > C.
