Hi,
This was my initial understanding but when we consider the Type PL2 and
the value pl2 we can observe that the value 6 does not conform to the
constraint and the syntax checkers did not fret about this. Please clarify.
Thanking you.
Yours Sincerely
Ramaswamy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Olivier Dubuisson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: [ASN.1] Interpretation?
> Ramaswamy wrote:
> > Hi,
> > As part of my learning of ASN.1 I wrote the following ASN.1 spec, so
> > this code serves no other purpose that aid in my understanding of the
> > ASN.1 language. Pls read thru the following spec -
> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > ParameterList DEFINITIONS AUTOMATIC TAGS ::=
> > BEGIN
> >
> > --ParameterList1 { hehe } ::= hehe
> >
> > ValueSet INTEGER ::= { 1|3|5|7|9 }
> >
> > ParameterList2 { Governor , Governor:Type } ::= SEQUENCE
> > {
> > value Type
> > }
> >
> > ParameterList3 { Governor, Governor:value } ::= SEQUENCE
> > {
> > val Governor DEFAULT value
> > }
> >
> > PL2 ::= ParameterList2 {INTEGER, {1|2|3|4|5}}
> >
> > PL3 ::= ParameterList3 {REAL,0}
> >
> > pl2 PL2 ::= { value 6 }
> >
> > END
> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >
> > I understand that PL3 is equivalent to the following
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> > PL3 ::= SEQUENCE
> > {
> > val REAL DEFAULT 0
> > }
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >
> > If the above interpretation is correct then how is PL2 to be
> > interpreted??
>
> PL2::= SEQUENCE {
> value INTEGER (1|3|5|7|9) }
> --
> Olivier DUBUISSON
> france telecom R&D
>
> DTL/TAL - 22307 Lannion Cedex - France
> t: +33 2 96 05 38 50 - f: +33 2 96 05 39 45 - http://asn1.elibel.tm.fr/
>
>
