Indeed, that will be an interesting multi-paradigm language: functional
object aspect oriented :-)

-Ramnivas

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 1:36 AM, Miles Sabin <mi...@milessabin.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 16, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Matthew Adams <matt...@matthewadams.me>
> wrote:
> > If you want this support, make sure to vote for these issues.  For
> > Scala support, you might want to enter your own issues at the AspectJ
> > and Scala projects.
>
> Aspects for Scala would be of interest to me.
>
> If I had unlimited free time I would most likely investigate the
> possibility of doing it via a combination of a Scala compiler plugin
> and a Scala internal DSL for specifying pointcuts, advice etc. rather
> than creating a whole new AspectS language akin to AspectJ. I would
> imagine that the standard AspectJ runtime could be reused pretty much
> as is.
>
> It'd be a pretty cool project to work on ...
>
> Cheers,
>
>
> Miles
>
> --
> Miles Sabin
> tel: +44 7813 944 528
> gtalk: mi...@milessabin.com
> skype: milessabin
> http://www.chuusai.com/
> http://twitter.com/milessabin
> _______________________________________________
> aspectj-users mailing list
> aspectj-users@eclipse.org
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users
>
_______________________________________________
aspectj-users mailing list
aspectj-users@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/aspectj-users

Reply via email to