I tried this and it is a lot faster - typically around 2 seconds
(instead of 10).
Doug Nelson wrote:
Is the native Aspell/WIN32 port supposed to be a lot faster than
simply invoking aspell via a batch file? If it is faster, is the time
savings mainly due to not having to "compile" the perl code every time
it's invoked? Is my question making sense? Every time I call aspell
(either in a command prompt or from a cobol application on windows),
it takes at least 10 seconds just to present the interface and I am
using pretty good hardware.
------
The information contained in this email and any attachments is confidential and
may be subject to copyright or other intellectual property protection. If you
are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to use or disclose this
information, and we request that you notify us by reply mail or telephone and
delete the original message from your mail system.
_______________________________________________
Aspell-user mailing list
Aspell-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/aspell-user
